Kulish Corrector for Class-A EF O/P Stage - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th December 2007, 07:31 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
Default Kulish Corrector for Class-A EF O/P Stage

I have done some preliminary simulations for the following topology, which develops further on the Mikhail Kulish error-correction scheme from these diyAudio threads:

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...14#post1277614
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...982#post856982

It is possible without much optimization to get THD of around <0.01% (2HD, 3HD components are both around -80 dB) in this voltage follower *without global negative feedback*.

The circuit as shown can deliver 14W into 8R with THD <0.01% at 20 kHz. There's no particular difficulty in:

1) Increasing the rail voltages to obtain higher power.
2) Paralleling more output devices.
3) Adding additional darlington stages to the Kulish error-corrector to drop the open-loop THD even further, maybe below the noise floor.
4) Driving the voltage follower stage with a high-quality op-amp like the LME49710, closing the global feeback loop and dropping the THD to maybe below 0.0001%.

Here's the schematic for the open-loop voltage-follower stage, extracted from LTspice:
Attached Images
File Type: png kulish_ef_scaled.png (70.7 KB, 1867 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2007, 07:36 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
Here's the FFT for the transient response when driven by a 15 V amplitude signal (note the amplitude of the primary when comparing the 2nd, 3rd harmonics which are at about -80 dB in comparison):
Attached Images
File Type: png kulish_fft2_scaled.png (27.4 KB, 1372 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2007, 07:42 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
The 1.04k resistor can be realized as a 1k resistor in series with 39R, and the 156R resistor can be realized as a 100R in series with a 56R. All LTSpice transistor models have been obtained from files previously posted at here at diyAudio.

The key property behind the Kulish error-corrector that allows it to be used in this topology is that when the load is attached at the collector of the transistor, it behaves as a pure transconductance amplifier - there is no need to recalculate the collector load resistances (1.04k and 156R in the example shown) to take into account the additional load from a later stage. The gain of each stage may drop, but the distortion figures remain more or less the same.

The second property is that the two emitter resistors in each stage of a Kulish error-corrector need not be the same - this simplifies biasing requirements when used in a multistage topology.

The third property (unused in this example) is that additional transistors (triple-, quadruple-darlington, etc.) can be added to each stage of the Kulish error-corrector to linearize it even further. The collector loads follow the multiplier sequence 1, 1.039..., 1.079..., ... (1.039)^k etc.

An additional property (unused in this example) is that it is possible to tap the emitter of the topmost transistor in each Kulish stage, losing some linearity (additional distortion), but getting a low-impedance output in exchange.

Here's the LTSpice .asc file (rename it to <something>.asc before loading it in LTSpice):
Attached Files
File Type: txt kulish_ef.txt (6.8 KB, 91 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 11:40 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
And here is the Class-A CFP output version, which is simpler and has even better distortion numbers than the EF version:
Attached Images
File Type: png kulish_cfp.png (40.2 KB, 1560 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 11:41 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
FFT plot of the transient response for a 20 KHz, 15V amplitude signal (2nd harmonic is at about -90dB, 3rd harmonic even lower - these are open-loop numbers, of course):
Attached Images
File Type: png kulish_fft3.png (27.8 KB, 1261 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 11:48 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
Here is the LTSpice schematic file of the Class-A CFP voltage follower (rename to <something>.asc before loading it in LTSpice). It's tolerant of a fairly wide range of supply voltages starting at about +/- 15V, but the higher the rails, the greater the power dissipation in the output stage:
Attached Files
File Type: txt kulish_cfp.txt (4.0 KB, 79 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 01:42 PM   #7
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
you're talking of a 4% adjustment to r1 &4.
Are the resistor values that critical to circuit operation?

Does it work in ClassAB or only as a ClassA stage?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 04:16 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
> you're talking of a 4% adjustment to r1 &4.

Yup - it approximately corresponds to the ratio Vt/Vbe = 26 mV/660 mV = ~3.9%

> Are the resistor values that critical to circuit operation?

The critical resistors are R1 & R4 above - these can be fixed after choosing
the other three in each corrector section. The other values are not critical,
they can be chosen for biasing convenience. If you vary R1 (& R4) and watch
the FFT plot, you will observe H2 and H3 decrease for a while and then start increasing - that minimum is the sweet spot (which varies depending on the
value chosen for the Vbe servo). Alternatively, fix R1 & R4 approximately
and vary the voltage of the Vbe servo to find a sweet spot that minimizes H2 and H3.

The ratio of H2 to H3 can also be altered by adjusting the value of the emitter ballast resistor in the output transistor. Generally, less seems to be better, but that will make DC bias stability harder to obtain. I've show 0.1R in the simulation, but practical designs should probably go with 0.47R and accept the higher distortion that results at large swings. In any event, GNFB will be required to remove DC offset at the output, and this will also help drop the H2/H3 and higher harmonic components (already almost non-existent) below the noise floor.

The distortion also becomes vanishingly small at smaller swings - say 1V peak. In this respect, the circuit seems to mimic the behaviour of the original classic JLH, but with better distortion numbers. For normal indoor listening levels, distortion may not even be measurable.

> Does it work in ClassAB or only as a ClassA stage?

It will work in Class AB also, but the kink in the curve during the transitions seems to mess up the distortion numbers - it drops back to the -50..-60 dB regime typically seen in uncorrected Class AB stages. Similarly, turn-on and turn-off transients also seem to mess up Class B distortion numbers.

I'm looking for a workaround for this, maybe Bromley or Sandeman Class S wrapped around this, with this being an accurate Class-A stage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 09:42 PM   #9
AKSA is offline AKSA  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
LXG,

Thank you for your work, it is outstanding.

I too noticed the Kulish work and had thought it amongst the best I've seen. It neatly gets around the EF bugbear - Vbe compressive distortion.

I'm no expert in PSpice, but I'd twigged to the extreme criticality of the tweaking to achieve proper error correction and decided that the added complexity, particularly in light of stability aspects with global feedback, were not worth the trouble for AB. Of course, EC is the subject of Edmond Stuart and Robert Cordell's posts; fascinating work.

Then I figured that an uncorrected Class A would sound damn good anyway, had built and auditioned them and then realised that EC was probably a concept better suited for laser trimmed chips, but not for discrete.

The transient response is very, very good - impressive getting all those devices to sing in tune!

It would seem that the CFP approach, whilst elegant and simpler, still must contend with that switching instability in Class AB. This is a well known issue for CFP. I have found they they only work well in Class A, though they can be tamed with careful layout and a little lag comp.

If it is true that the best approach with amplifiers is to make all stages linear as possible, then apply global feedback, would not efforts best be spent on the voltage amplifier?

Thank you again, food for thought.....

Hugh
__________________
Aspen Amplifiers P/L (Australia)
www.aksaonline.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2007, 09:58 PM   #10
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Cheers for that.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kulish Corrector applications GEirin Solid State 12 30th December 2007 07:52 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2