|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
|
There have been some recent posts on these chips. Apparently the uPC has a few different versions, most of which are obsolete or will be soon. One post mentioned that of the 4 NTE's he got from China, 3 were bad. I wouldn't mind using the NTE but it only goes to a 60 VDC rail and I need to go to at least 80 and preferably 100VDC.
At the moment I'm playing with a variation of the common discreet circuits. Most of them have some kind of a detection circuit based around a couple transistors or a bridge rectifier that drives a couple transistors. I'd like to use a chip rather than a bunch of discreets as board space is very limited. So I wonder, what chip is in common use these days? Certainly all of the surround receivers use something that is current. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Left of the Dial
|
I may be wrong, but I believe many (most?) modern protection is handled by a chip which also provides a host of other functions as well.
I'd consider Rod Elliot's board (it's very small), since integrated solutions seem to be disappearing. According to the data sheet, the uPC1237 is also limited to 60V. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Left of the Dial
|
Well, I know you've used it because we've discussed it. Rod apparently had three design goals...simplicity, small size, and low cost. The latter is likely why there's no solder mask.
I wish I could help out, but I have next-to-no idea what the new stuff is using. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I use the uPC1237 myself, I have no problems buying them from my local supplier. It works exactly as described in the data sheet. You need to figure out some resistor values if you want symmetrical offset protection. I use one uPC per channel as they are so cheap and it helps to keep channels and channel wiring separate. Indeed it is limited to 60V but that should be trivially easly fixed with a couple of resistors. Just make sure the supply to the chip never gets above 60V. Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
|
I plan to use the NTE7100 and my breadboard version seems to work okay. I plan to use a simple dropping resistor as shown in the UPC1237 datasheet.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
You want to limit the supply of course, not the input voltage. I think paulb above answered it. Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Hague
|
Hello Jan, YGM.
Greetings, Loek |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Belgrade RS
|
Don't wast time here is complet!
Regards zeoN_Rider |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question on uPC1237 | Buzzy | Solid State | 18 | 3rd August 2008 01:22 AM |
| Upc1237 Ic | d3imlay | Solid State | 3 | 7th February 2008 12:14 PM |
| upc1237 circuit diagram.. | clovi_kate | Solid State | 1 | 4th May 2007 10:16 AM |
| UPC1237 IC Amp Protector | matt09 | Chip Amps | 5 | 2nd November 2006 06:59 PM |
| Problems with UPC1237 | Risto80 | Solid State | 4 | 27th December 2004 02:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10451 seconds (81.82% PHP - 18.18% MySQL) with 11 queries |