|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#901 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
GEirin,
I'm away, but the discussion is getting so interesting... I can't resist... Now we are trying to unmystify the Naim's circuit secrets ![]() Here are my 2 cents: The R/C circuits are adding some phase margin at frequencies starting somewhere above 700kHz if I remember correctly. I guess for improved stability. Unfortunately, the critical frequency of the R/C is determined by the drivers bandwidth; actually, by all transistors BW and poles that they create. For our DIY versions we don't know whether those R/Cs are optimal in any given semiconductor choice, but they work ... obviously. I tried once to make them identical, because I thought "why not, why should they be different?". Well, I noticed that some imbalance was present. There is certain current flowing through them and when they are the "Naim way" the voltage drop across them is equal. If you make them identical, the voltage drop is different and that in my opinion will make the feedback to work harder in order to keep the output to 0V. The question is why the current through them is different? I don't see it. Someone, please explain the Kirchhoff law to me ... If Nigel or anyone else can give some idea that would be very nice. They are cleverly calculated for the same fc, but kind of adopted for different currents through them (I'm talking DC currents here). The R/C groups and the 22k resistor are the 2 things that make this circuit different from the basic and not upgraded Self Blameless. I suspect that they are the reason for the good Naim sound plus, for some unclear reason, the quasi-complementary output. Would be nice to know scientifically how to tweak any similar circuit and to achieve the same excellent results. Last edited by Ruwe; 2nd May 2012 at 11:37 PM. |
|
|
|
#902 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oxfordshire
|
Ruwe it's two things . The Quad ESL 57's is the key and the imbalance between a Darlington and a Szikai pair also ( Apologies to the people who just love music , it is a fascination for people like me who should go to bed at 1.1 3 AM to talk about this ) .
It was a marriage . The sound between Naim and 57's is something to dream to own . Adjust the power amp to +/- 27 V regulated for optimum ESL 57 performance . |
|
|
|
#903 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oxfordshire
|
Kirchhoff is badly said by me to be
"The sum of the currents entering a node is equal to the sum of the current exiting it ". I have in fact combined two laws . I was taught that in electronics in 1974 when as usual I asked an audio question . What does it mean ? It is like saying how many motors cars enter a roundabout ( road junction ) and how many leave . It should always be equal . The implication of this is that everything is in the signal path . When Kirchhoff can not be used one applies Gaussian Sphere principle . An op amp is like that . We can not enter the op amp so we say what is around the op amp is the Kirchhoff solution . Apologies to kit builders and music lovers . Kirchhoff is obvious . Yet it seems to escape the attention of many audio engineers . KIrchoff - Bunsen Burner . We all used them at school . |
|
|
|
#904 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oxfordshire
|
|
|
|
|
#905 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: fatehpur
|
|
|
|
|
#906 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, on the east coast
|
Masood, This is a thread about kits bought on Ebay. The post by filholder is four years ago.
If you want to copy Ebay kits you can read any Ebay trader's site quoted from the posts in this thread and maybe you can see the images well enough to copy. As you can buy the complete kit for the parts cost, it may just be a waste of materials. copying them.
__________________
regards |
|
|
|
#907 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: fatehpur
|
dear ian,
thanks alot.yours masood |
|
|
|
#908 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oxfordshire
|
A freind of mine originated this circuit as far as I know . He isn't mentioned here . Keep a copy of this safe if you ever want to do a tube design . It also shows how a LM317 can be used at higher voltages . This is a very good design .
DIY Test Equipment for Audio and Ham Radio Enthusiasts |
|
|
|
#909 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: buenos aires
|
Hello everyone: I wanted to consult those who have created this circuit if used a voltage exceeding 40 volts feeding symmetric, for example: 45 volts symmetric
regards |
|
|
|
#910 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
The resistors R6-R7 (on both channel) are blackened, browned and very hot when you touch them. I state that the amp works but I think it's a symptom of some problem. Can someone help me? Last edited by ciariello; 19th June 2012 at 07:52 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GB - F5 Clone | suds | Group Buys | 3 | 23rd August 2010 01:03 PM |
| Tube Preamp 'Clone' PCB copys on ebay (Marantz, McIntosh, etc) | powertriode | Tubes / Valves | 57 | 11th August 2007 07:59 PM |
| Question regarding ProAc 2.5 Clone and Tempo 2 Clone | zoooh | Multi-Way | 5 | 11th March 2003 08:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |