My Bridge Amp - Page 9 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th May 2011, 11:11 AM   #81
hpt is offline hpt  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
hpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
With respect, minimising component count is not always of primary concern.

"Perfs"... I do not understand?

Last edited by hpt; 20th May 2011 at 11:15 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011, 12:48 PM   #82
wahab is offline wahab  Algeria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
Quote:
Originally Posted by hpt View Post
With respect, minimising component count is not always of primary concern.

"Perfs"... I do not understand?
Performances...

As for component count, well , the law of diminushing returns
tame down any improvement based on this metric past a few
dozen transistors..

There s more to gain by reconsidering the design guideline...

Throwing more components to resolve each problem doesnt
seems to me the best path.

That said, CBS design is quite amazing on an engineering
point of view...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011, 10:36 PM   #83
CBS240 is offline CBS240  United States
diyAudio Member
 
CBS240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
Hi

I agree there is no reason to just throw in extra components in for sh!ts and giggles, but there are some things that just work. Take the cascode or common base (gate) amplifier. There are certain advantages to this but it requires more parts, mostly nickel and dime parts.

As far as the component count in this circuit, there are many different separate circuits on the PCB. Each circuit can be regarded as a 'black box'. These 'black boxes' are direct coupled to form a modular system. Kind of an all in one deal.

On the one PCB is the power supply, high current rect. filter caps ect (+/-24V), two voltage doubler circuits and two discrete voltage regulators based on J-fets that produce +/-40Vdc and +/-15Vdc. Also there is a pre-amplifier circuit with input buffers and 2 discrete DC servos (one for each phase). The pre-amplifier has it's own IPS and VAS, with a FB loop and compensation that encompass only the two stages. The output of this circuit is balanced and feeds the input of the VAS circuit but is direct coupled. The VAS circuit has an input stage/w VAS that has it's own FB loop encompassing 2 stages. The BW and stability of these circuits is very good. Each of these amplifier sections consist of a constant power, balanced bridge circuit with matched components, and then there are the common mode biasing amplifiers for each.

And then there are the two output stages. In this version each output stage follower is an adaptation of Bob's vertical fet HEC. The output stages are not within the FB loop of the VAS circuit, they are pure followers. The only loop that surrounds the whole circuit is the DC servos, Fc~0.3Hz. I actually did some experimenting with this as I left on the PCB the option of encompassing the output stage within the VAS amplifier section but the results seemed to be better without the HEC stage in the loop. I have learned that SR and BW is not everything. There are more variables involved in reproducing good sound through a moving coil speaker. I added some cascodes to the HEC stages along with bootstrap drivers (works great BTW) and the ability to adjust the bias of both OPS at the same time with one single pot via two IL300 linear opto-couplers. So this circuit and the OP-amp servos for each IL300 are also included. I have found this circuit, although it works fine, is not required. So the next version will have a static bias set into each HEC stage. Saving on a few parts right there....besides, those IL300s are $3 each....

All the components of the different circuits add up, there is more going on, on this single PCB than just an input stage, VAS, and OPS.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......

Last edited by CBS240; 20th May 2011 at 10:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2012, 03:15 AM   #84
diyAudio Member
 
Workhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Floating balanced single supply amplifiers are really an addiction for me
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full Bridge X Half Bridge: What's The Best? CHACALPOWERS Power Supplies 8 18th July 2008 04:45 PM
Reopening an unfinished debate: Dual bridge vs. Single Bridge xiphmont Chip Amps 15 26th February 2008 07:22 PM
The difference of Push-pull,Half-bridge,Full-bridge digi01 Chip Amps 0 8th September 2006 02:10 AM
Whats the difference between full bridge and half-bridge SMPS ? skaara Class D 6 3rd February 2005 07:23 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2