|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#41 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
OK
Now for a few latest waveforms... The top left is a 300KHz square wave at 10Vp per phase. bottom left is a 400KHz sine wave, Ch 2 is inverted and added to Ch 1 so this is what you see across the speaker. Top right is 100KHz both phases and bottom left is the same, just showing the sum across the load.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
This one I like. Check out the low frequency responce...well into the sub-sonic. This is a 20 cycle square wave. The top is the input, and the bottom is the output, 2.5A. Notice how little degeneration the signal suffers.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
This is a larger scale of the 20 Hz square wave. This is 20V peak on 8 Ohms. I nearly burned up the resistor I used to test this one, and with the 300KHz square wave, left it on too long and kinda burned my finger.
Next I will test the 20 Hz square wave with a speaker and see what the reactive load throws into the mix.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
It was too late yesterday to crank out up a speaker with low tones, but here is 18 Hz square wave driving a 4 Ohm sub, 10V peak. The time base is 10mS, so the shutter of the camera caught a double trace, But you can see the shape well. There is a little bit of overshoot, but man, that cone was movin'. It sounded like a badly muffled car engine.
I think the amp would drive a lower impedance as is, with a more beefy power supply. The problem is there are only 4 TO-220 outputs. They are quite rugged for their size, but I doubt they could do much more than 100W RMS due to SOA, even with an oversized heat sink. However, I see no reason why I can't use larger devices. This way I won't have to match mosfet transistors. It is nice to be able to just take one out of the package, slap it in the circuit and it works perfectly because the circuit operation is not dependent on specific parameters of a particular device. Since they are essentially in series, they require no matching. That bit about not having to use a speaker relay is quite step. I would never have expected this circuit would have no DC output misbalance to the speaker when the power is switched on or off. A completely accidental discovery. I was planning to use a couple of UPC1237's or equivalent to drive a relay, which I would still have to find and experiment with. This puts me much closer to making the PCB a reality.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Complicated? Naw, ....well maybe just a wee bit.
TO-126 horizontal parts are the Vbe multipliers/EC. The TO-126 vertical parts are the drivers, and the ones with 2 leads are Caddock resistors as output source resistors. It looks like it all runs together, but there are actually seperate circuit sections, somewhat symetrical. My rules for the 201 size SMD resistors are, no more than 20V and no more than 20mW. There are many here but most are just a few mW. I derate the SOT-563 parts to 100mW although it is less in this circuit. I think there are two that are at 50mW, the rest are less. These things are great for CCS, among other things because they take very little space for two descrete transistors. The whole circuit will use no more than 30mA, excluding the channels of the output mosfets. If it works as good as the Frankenstien circuit I have now, all the hours spent will have been worth it. Still many design checks to make yet...EDIT: TOP
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
The outputs are on the bottom side and will mount to a bracket, just like the Frankinstien circuit does.
BOTTOM
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
BOTH
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Here are some triangle waveforms along with hard and soft clipping on the load at 50KHz. At hard clipping, the output stage(s) actually decrease bias into class B operation, so there is some crossover components, but it has to be continously driven into hard clipping for this to happen. In spite of the complexity, this seems to be the most stable amplifier I've made yet.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
And 100KHz triangle...
Now, if I can only scrape together the funds to finish the PCB.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
|
thank you to keep us informed related your researches. regards, Carlos
__________________
Audiophoolery; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7ERMu825m4; Dx Super Etching; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WED3Bvmxepk |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Full Bridge X Half Bridge: What's The Best? | CHACALPOWERS | Power Supplies | 8 | 18th July 2008 04:45 PM |
| Reopening an unfinished debate: Dual bridge vs. Single Bridge | xiphmont | Chip Amps | 15 | 26th February 2008 07:22 PM |
| The difference of Push-pull,Half-bridge,Full-bridge | digi01 | Chip Amps | 0 | 8th September 2006 02:10 AM |
| Whats the difference between full bridge and half-bridge SMPS ? | skaara | Class D | 6 | 3rd February 2005 07:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |