|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Is it possiblie to add a Balanced input to P68?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
Yes, it is possible. But some parts rearrangement should be in order. Why don't you ask Rod about that? Carlos |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I asked him after I posted the first message
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
What did Rod suggest?
The next question is why do you want to use a balanced connection. Do you plan to put your sub amp close to the speaker? My first idea to make a balanced version of the 300W, is doing something like what Nelson Pass did on the Aleph 4. As I said some parts should be added or cut, like R3 on the 300W amp. Perhaps R3 could be replaced with 220 ohms, and a similar one added on the other end, between the feedback and Q3's base. R1 and R9 should be the same too, as well as capacitors C1 and C4. In any case I would suggest these changes to Rod and listen to what he says. Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Round Rock, TX
|
Couldn't you just put a balanced receiver in front of the normal circuit? Rod's simple op-amp solution, driving where C1 connects?
http://www.sound.westhost.com/project51.htm |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Round Rock, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
All this question is interesting if you're going to use a long cable between preamp and power amp. Are you?
The idea of making the balanced input directly on the power amp is to eliminate stages. If you add a balanced to unbalanced stage before the amp you will be adding distortion. noise, etc. Project 51 is reasonable for the balanced output stage, which is similar to that used by Mackie. But the unbalanced to balanced circuit is not good. The other project is interesting but very complicated. It's an instrumentation amplifier, which also needs 0.1% resistors to justify using it. If you need balanced stages, use balancing or unbalancing chips like SSM2142 and DRV134. Can you explain more on your intended application? Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The reason I'm interested in converting the P68 to balanced is a the balanced crossover I've got.
It can operate in normal mode so if the conversion isn't a good idea it won't be a problem. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
As I said, if connections are short you don't need to go balance. Except if you are working from the source with a balanced signal, feeding balanced pots and all that. Don't believe it if you read it otherwise. The only good thing you will have for balanced connections is the XLR connector you will be probably using. Carlos |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Balanced input impedance | fotios | Solid State | 8 | 27th July 2009 09:24 PM |
| PP to balanced input | wicked1 | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 25th February 2009 10:21 PM |
| Aleph 3 balanced input | Odysei | Pass Labs | 10 | 2nd June 2005 03:02 PM |
| balanced input stage | sonix | Tubes / Valves | 54 | 5th June 2004 02:47 PM |
| Balanced Input Stage | Bukitoo | Solid State | 5 | 11th March 2004 03:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11117 seconds (81.41% PHP - 18.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |