|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
"I would not go for a bridge amp since damping factor is cut to half when you go bridging...."
Then how come the Crown amps have DF over 1000, even though they are a bridged design? "subwoofers are going in and out excessively to the extremes because damping factors are so little to control excursion" Not related in any way, shape, or form to the DF of those amplifiers. The excessive cone motion is due to many things, none related to DF. The biggest problem is dynamic off-set due to the cap in the feedback loop of the amplifier becoming mis-charged under large signal conditions. The time constant of this cap and the lower arm feedback resistor is generally below 2hz. When overloaded this cap discharges out-of-phase with the input signal and sends rail-to-rail pulses to the woofer below 2hz (causing the motion you see). A similar problem can show up with the transformer coupled amps (discussed by you in another thread). The asymetrical nature of audio signals will walk-the-core over to one side and when driven hard will cause the woofer to jerk back when all the energy in the transformer core is discharged (generally a time constant below 10hz). As regards DF in general, it makes no difference if over about 20. One thing everyone forgets is the DC resistance of the speaker itself (around 6 ohms for an 8 ohm speaker) is in series with the motional resistance of the generator (back EMF of the speaker). So the 'real' DF is this 6 ohms in series with the wire resistsance, connector resistance (on the speaker, box, and amplifier), crossover choke (if used), and lastly, amplifier output impedance. So does it matter if the amplifier output impedance is 0.001 ohms, or 0.1 ohms when it is in series with 6 ohms? OF COURSE NOT! Besides, the instant the amplifier clips, the 0.001 ohms becomes more like 2~3 ohms with the loss of feedback.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Well said djk.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
http://www2.yamaha.co.jp/manual/pdf/.../SepA/B-2x.pdf
See the block diagram on page 7. The low distortion class A amp corrects for the errors in the high power amp.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
Sandman, circa 1972 (Wireless World)
Consider two amplifiers, A1 and A2. A1 has 20dB of gain, R1=1K, R2=10K (A2 has the same resistors). A1 runs off ±52V, A2 runs off ±6V. A1 is a cheap and dirty class AB+B amplifier, A2 is class A. If A1 had no distortion the summing input would be at 0V, and the output of A2 would be virtual ground. With 1.414V into A1 the output would be 28.3V (200W/4R). Assume A1 is driving a ground referred load at 200W/4R with 1% distortion, there will be about 2.828V distortion at its output, and about 0.257V distortion at its summing input. Now hook up A2 and it will output 2.828V that is exactly the same as the distortion out of A1. With the same distortion voltage on both ends of the load the distortion will cancel. A2 must be able to deliver the same current as A1, but only a fraction of the voltage swing is required.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
great example djk...
thanks for the info...
__________________
H V E Audio |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Very interesting to learn of this. Thanks for the information djk.
However, it does seem excessively complicated that way with dissimilar amplifiers to design, power and drive. My feeling is that the original question of this thread related to using either a single big amp or two similar smaller amps. At least longthrow now has some pointers. My preference would be for the simpler solution of a single amp, and to concentrate on optimising it rather than introduce the complexity of the bridge amp scheme. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
Depends on what you want, and what it's for.
No point in my mind to bridge unless running more than about ±95V, and then I would consider class G. BSS made asymetrical bridge amps for PA with one half being class A, and the other half either G or H.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: City of Gentle People
|
hi dgk,
thanks for the insights, specially on time constants. well, I just based my veiws on actual experience with normal or bridge configurations. yet so much interested to know more on time constants...
__________________
"to invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk..." - Thomas Alva Edison |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: City of Gentle People
|
longthrow,
my amp is having plus/minus 90vdc on the rails yet BULKY and HEAVY enough to break my back! nice thing your planning on SMPS... for me bridging eats more space, well , depends on how you arrange and how you design PCB's... bai, do you have ideas as to where to buy better extruded heatsinks.?
__________________
"to invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk..." - Thomas Alva Edison |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does anyone know the name of this configuration? | wildswan | Solid State | 0 | 9th January 2009 12:25 AM |
| HELP Transformer, its configuration | gamberone | Parts | 7 | 25th July 2007 10:18 AM |
| 'Best' Configuration for car sub | herulach | Subwoofers | 5 | 13th May 2006 04:36 PM |
| Best configuration for this subwoofer and box? | ooheadsoo | Subwoofers | 3 | 19th March 2004 04:16 PM |
| odd configuration | Patrat | Multi-Way | 0 | 4th February 2003 04:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13769 seconds (75.02% PHP - 24.98% MySQL) with 11 queries |