|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Left of the Dial
|
Watch this thread for:
{{{Canadians Gone Wild!!}}} Coming soon to a forum near you... |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||||
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi morfeeus,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You may be able to improve the sound, I'll bet you can. The problem is that the way these new sets are made, including the power supply and heat sinks, you are attempting to make a pig fly. The amplifier design and layout have sunk you before you even start. You're stuck with it. So you will improve the sound quality but it will never be great. Sorry. Quote:
-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
|
Why not just blow your $100 on wanky interconnects, then you don't run the risk of burning yourself with your soldering iron.
I say this as someone who, like you, has modified their soundcard to improve its performance, but I did this thoughtfully, not by just whacking in some overpriced capacitors. I'm with anatech. The performance of your amplifier is not going to be limited by distortion in a few random passives. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Enjoy good sound
diyAudio Member
|
On more on the topic...
Hi morfeeus, consider this: A good decoupling cap with long leads will be degraded to a not so good cap, maybe not an improvement at all over the original cap. A large coupling cap will pickup more airborne noise then a small cap due to larger surface area. Take great care where to place the cap if it not fits in the original place, definitely not directly over a digital chip.
__________________
/ Anders |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
I think we are back to my observations near the start of the thread. Receivers cram so much functionality in to so little space that they have to make compromises. One compromise is that in general they leave very little leeway for making mods. AVR's even more so. The manufacturers have pretty much learned how far they can push the limits. Back i the good old 70's, the same company would have been less sure how far it could (for instance in terns of power density) and tended to "over build" the product for typical consumer use.
Actually I think this is good thing so far as the average (non-audio nut) buyer goes. The functionality to price relationship is very good. It's what I would do if I were running the company. Of course, if I were running a smaller audiophile oriented company I would probably do something different, like not even offer a receiver. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
I just had another thought. Does this unit have pre-outs. One of the more useful things you can do with a receiver especially an AVR is to use it like tuner/preamp/processor and use a separate and core capable amplifier. Audiophile processor/preamp are pretty pricey and may or may not perform better (noise floor etc) compared to the corresponding section in some receivers.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi sam9,
Most Yamaha receivers do have RCA outputs. They also use the better DSP chips in their upper models. This is one area where Yamaha is very good, but that is for surround sound. 2 channel audio is very limited in North America. -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hey DIY'ers.
I would like to take back a few hasty words from my previous post specifically "some ancient decades old archived stereo product" Sorry for the insult and the intrusion of discussing my soundcard mods on this thread. I understand the all the rage I've wrongfully so initiated. I have overstepped the boundiries by being so negative. Just like you to know sum bits about myself. I am by no means knowledgable in the field of electronics. I've been a audiophile in audio equipment most my life taking pleasure in enjoying music and experiencing decades of audio products that have forth come. My earliest product experience (ownership) being the INFINITY QLS 1 and PHASE LINEAR 500 and 4000. Next decade being Classe' DR2 25 watt class A power amp and Presence Audio Linestage 1 Then a few years later Bryston 4bst with Balanced Audio Technologies VK-3i Pre. Just like you to understand and not boast my experience with audio equipment. Basically I would like to enhance the equipment I presently own being on another level of performance of course. Keep up the informative posts. I'm takin it all in. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi morfeeus,
That's fair enough. I'm glad you are posting on this topic again. Realistically, you can improve the signal stages with op amp upgrades. You may want to look at your low voltage power supplies also. The power amplifier stages can be improved also, but don't expect fabulous performance. Yamaha MI amps are good, and some consumer separate amplifiers. Late model receivers are hampered by cost constraints. To start, did you order the service manual from Yamaha? When I did warranty service for them, the manuals ran about $20. Not bad at all. -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hey anatech
Still haven't got around to ordering the service manual. But will get to it. Worse yet I yet to uncover my reciever case to have a peek inside. When I do I will take some photos and post them. To see how condensed internallly it may very well be. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mod - Upgrading opamps in a yamaha av receiver | dsiroky | Solid State | 9 | 11th November 2010 09:57 PM |
| yamaha receiver r-300 | edgar_tm | Chip Amps | 9 | 15th May 2009 10:39 PM |
| Yamaha R5 natural sound receiver | OneyedK | Analog Line Level | 2 | 26th December 2007 11:12 AM |
| Interfacing chipamp to Yamaha 639 receiver | yusuf | Chip Amps | 0 | 9th April 2007 06:56 AM |
| Yamaha receiver second room | d_gil | Parts | 0 | 3rd February 2003 01:35 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13168 seconds (82.11% PHP - 17.89% MySQL) with 10 queries |