|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
...OK we all seem to agree that the high frequency PSRR of the class A output stage is important to suppress the distorsions from the class B part.
And of course it is a combination of the parasitic capacitances and the transistor transconductance. But transconductance might be poorer than many people expect. In my Rookie amp examinations especially most PNPs did not really show great properties, - already in DC examination.... together with capacitances... That's why I was considering to adjust AB instead of B. Your heat sinks could probably handle that. |
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Okaayyy.....the error corrected class A power module is now added to the list:
http://users.picknowl.com.au/~glenk/MAIN.HTM (previous) http://users.picknowl.com.au/~glenk/CLASSA.HTM (+new one) Haven't got time to do a technical write up ATM though......... To be continued......... |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
...uahu... even if I am a fan of simple designs. This design I do like even with that giant component count.
Hope you get it running properly. ... I can't resist to ask: Do you really need a tripple darlington for the output stage? I mean your main amp is sophisticated enough to be modified without additional components to drive a little bit more current. Don't bother, it is my passion to strip down circuits And there are also people here, who clearly state that I tend to strip down my circuits to much for their taste. |
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
It's actually a quad darlington output! And yes, it is required, as the error correction circuit requires a high input impedance to work as best as possible. The EC circuit develops an exact voltage across the 750 ohm input resistor to counter and compensate for any deviation between the input and output voltages. This input resistor should be presented with little loading from the output stage. The output current is limited to 64A, which is a nice safety factor of 100% over the peak current at the rated power of 1000Wrms into 2 ohms. All BJT's used are high fT devices (especially the pre drivers), so speed isn't a problem. Cheers, Glen |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Glen,
I just caught your thread. Nice project. Look up the Carver Lightstar amplifier. They used about 13 VDC differential between the outputs and the tracking power supply. Now, if you use switching mosfets for the PWM "down convertor" you will end up with a simplified, reliable amplifier. The high frequency switchers are easier to filter out than class B types. I think they ran about 40 KHz. Don't forget, Carver left the class B supply tracking for PWM voltage control at high frequency. You could lose most of that heatsink material. Just a thought. -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
|
Quote:
I haven't had time to go over the design thoroughly, so quick question - does amp have global FB or is OP EC sole means of linearising OP stage? Also, WRT OP stage only and at full power - what do you envisage the EC voltage swing will be. IOW the total non linearity from IP to OP (of the OP stage), that the 750R IP R will be correcting for? It is quite complex but should be very linear. cheers Terry |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
Quote:
You are crazy What do you smoke? I am just on chocolate.... But it is a fantastic project! Go on, I am curiously reading. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Judging by the 240 Re's and GK's avatar pic, XTC by the ounce.
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread. |
|
|
|
|
#69 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avalon Island
|
Quote:
__________________
Just because you can't hear it doesn't mean no one can. |
||
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avalon Island
|
BTW,
Do you find the Hawkford EC effective for "class A" Any idea how much distortion reduction?
__________________
Just because you can't hear it doesn't mean no one can. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class D Vs Class I (Balanced Current Amplifier) | rmsaudio | Class D | 28 | 29th September 2006 07:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11893 seconds (79.60% PHP - 20.40% MySQL) with 11 queries |