Hi-Fi Class B Amplifier - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th June 2007, 08:29 PM   #1
kostazl is offline kostazl  Bulgaria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BG, Sofia
Default Hi-Fi Class B Amplifier

Some history

At the latest 60s in Bulgaria there was an amplifier called “Studio 2 3x35Watts Hi-Fi Amplifier”. The manufacturer was a public manufacturer, and at that time (under the communism) there were limited components available to be used. One was the legendary 2N3055 Romanian or Bulgarian made. The rest of the components were BD139/140, 2T3552/3682, one KD504 and two BC337, and of course a minimalistic but lovely bootstrapped VAS. Very, very old school, so retro, so old fashion - you name it. And before couple of mounts I've heard that thing and I have lost my mind with it. This amplifier was indescribable - precise highs, flat and clear mids and deep powerful bass. I was not even thinking about to use the EQ … And on top of that the nominal supply voltage was just +/-32V, but I swear it sounds above that. That was my true expiration…
So here's the deal.

Some theoretical principals

A real audiophile's high fidelity amplifier has to meet some critical requirements, which are in relation with the human's common psycho-acoustical model. There are so many theories about them that everyone can get lost.
For example some of the engineers claim that the symmetry is essential, from the impute transistor couple, trough the VAS to the output.
There is also an opposite opinion, that claim the non symmetry is closer to the reality and gives more freedom to the designer, which I found is true.
That's why I am going to observe the practice [mine and other's], and to simply take those which are more involved in the ever lasting question - why the amplifiers are having similar parametric but in the same time are so differently sounding.
They are the well known issues: THD,TIMD, Power bandwidth, Dumping factor, Temperature and frequency/phase stability, simplicity, low cost, and so so ...
Most of the theorists claim that they are in a strong relation to each other. For example if you have low THD. So most commonly you have all other parametric within acceptable value. Well, that's the tricky moment. They are missing some extremely important parametric, and here they are: TIMD, phase shifting, dumping factor, fast response and the harmonic's structure. Also they're very difficult to be measured, due to its complexity. So the best way is to evaluate them while doing the scratch, with the irreplaceable assistance of the SPICE modeling.
Achieving low TIM distortions is not that easily as the low harmonic distortions. As a matter of fact in the practice they're in an opposite relation to each other. It's all about the proportion. The point were they equals is the "holly grail" for the audiophile's amplifier. However, lower TIMD means lower [but as flat as possible] open loop gain, and especially low [but high enough] margin between the open loop and the closed loop gain.
True distortion cancellation schematic is possible only if you're following two paths - feed-forward error correction or current negative feedback. The first one is more complicated and very often quite unstable with complexity of various frequency compensations. The second one is more attractive, because of its nature to be stable, giving in the same time very high slew rate, and is achieving amazingly low TIM distortion.
Of course there is a catch and when you use a true current feedback, the dumping is good, but limited to a lower point, in comparison with the voltage feedback topology, which of course leads to low efficiency.
So here comes the conclusion that if you use a global voltage feedback and local current feedback, you takes there advantages and you're avoiding there disadvantages. But how exactly this can happen? Here's how.


The input stage


I preferred to use the long-tied input PNP-type transistor couple T101 and T102, loaded by a constant voltage generator, made by the zener diode D101 and some RC filters. There is also an option for additional adjustment (by turning R102), because of the manufacturing tolerance of the transistors. Instead of long tailed pair of transistor couple, for the upper and the lower side of the input stage. The advantages of that old school schematic are extremely important - essential frequency stability [oscillations free due to the limited gain], and a good harmonic's spread spectrum.
The VAS is extremely simple but by using a quality NPN transistor Q103 with good supply voltage margin [at least two times] the distortions are at it's minimum. The usage of Bootstrapped constant current load is for purpose - the limited bypass of the electrolytic capacitor is around 50 kHz which is very useful and it is kind of positive feedback giving additional linearization.
There's also additional 3-level frequency compensation. First the input, then the lag- and load- compensation, and third - the compensation in the NFB's loop, eliminating any possible instability issues. In addition there's a temperature compensating diodes for the VAS. No phase compensation is aloud, because of the dramatic decrease of the open loop bandwidth, just the input filter is responsible for the limited bandwidth.
The next stage is of course the final stage. It's the well known "Quad 303's triples". It's a "state of art" - a quasi complimentary topology giving unbeatable performance. The reason that I chose the quasi complimentary is that the market is overfilled with lots of fakes of very popular complimentary transistors, but on the other hand it is very easy to find a good and original TO-3s. For example ST, ON and Fairchild are still manufacturing them, and the storages have almost unlimited stock of TO-3s.
This final stage is even "amplifying" by voltage [thanks to the Ziklai-alike configuration] and the voltage drop is almost two times less. This is dramatically improving the dumping factor and the efficiency, additionally managing essential load control. Additional benefit is the "lack" of commutating distortions even in pure class B condition. To gain excellent distortion figure you need for the final transistors to conduct only 5-6 mA.
The protection plays two roles: by sensing the voltage drops over the power resistors and passing it trough the diodes [when the voltage exceeds the threshold forward voltage of the diodes] into the input of the triples. Simultaneously this "threshold" point changes with the temperature drift of the output transistors, giving good temperature compensation.
So the protection is simple, but very effective and the fuses are just in any case. The output current limit is set to around 4 amperes, which is quite enough for 4-ohms load.

I am not giving the values now, simply to make you honestly say what do you thing about that very unusual schematic. I’ll give them later. I thing that this can be the next most popular DIY project … unless I am totally wrong…
Attached Images
File Type: gif schematic.gif (58.6 KB, 1928 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2007, 08:55 PM   #2
Dzsoni is offline Dzsoni  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Kostazl,

Lot thanks for posting this schematic and thanks for your comment on it. This's a lovely design for me!
I'm from Hungary, not very far from Bulgaria. We were under the pressure of the Soviet regime too, so here we used old-fashioned schematics too with cheap and simple parts as your schematic does.
And I prefer these designs in this modern days too! Now there is democracy in Bulgaria and Hungary, with modern semiconductors etc... But the amplifiers from the previous regime are excellent, nowadays too! Many times I feel these old-fashined amplifiers using 2N3055, bootstrapped VAS, etc... are sounding better than the modern 0.00001%-THD so called "audiophile" amplifiers.

So please keep on work, I love these amplifiers!
And please post us the parts list if you can.

Regards,

Dzsoni
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2007, 09:13 PM   #3
Dzsoni is offline Dzsoni  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Photo of a 2×250W PA-amplifier using Checzslovakian Tesla-KD502 as output transistors in serial-quasicomplementray arrangement, driven by some BD137. Made in Hungary in the 80's.
Sorry it's not HiFi but a nice "socialist" type PA-amplifier. These amplifiers are working nowadays too, without any faults or problems!

Really workhorses with cheap parts.

Regards,

PS.: This "Studio 35W" amplifier would be a nice DIY-project!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg c500.jpg (41.0 KB, 1537 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2007, 10:25 PM   #4
teemuk is offline teemuk  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Suomi, Finland
Hi kostazl,

What are the purposes of R105 and R115? Shouldn't C105 have a series resistor?

I do have to disagree with you about this being an unusual schematic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007, 09:49 AM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Please explain again what D104 & D105 are doing?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007, 01:57 PM   #6
Symon is offline Symon  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Herts, UK
My guess is D104 and D105 prevent excessive reverse biasing and possible breakdown of Q105 and Q108 ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007, 03:16 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
destroyer X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
Default The schematic provided may sound great


Someone will have to be very bad to destroy this topologie sonics.

I cannot believe this one will sound sound bad.

Very nice schematics.... socialist block had very good amplifiers we could see researching the internet.

Very good that we have all of you around us now a days.... more pictures please...show us what old socialist block was doing those last fourty years.

regards,

Carlos
__________________
DxS, the best from the best...the cream from the cream, the best wide world ever made audio amplifier.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007, 06:01 PM   #8
kostazl is offline kostazl  Bulgaria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BG, Sofia
Well, firstly this is not the original schematic, but it’s based on it. D102 and D103 is a thermal compensation for the VAS, and they are necessary, because the Bootstrap loader cannot compensate the thermal drift of Q103 /with other words the diodes are in any case/. R105 is limiting the gain of the input stage and R115 is limiting the VAS gain, so the global open loop gain is flat until 20 kHz. Soon I will post the original schematic of the amplifier…
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007, 06:46 PM   #9
kostazl is offline kostazl  Bulgaria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BG, Sofia
Here is a part of the original schematic (the final stage). I am also ready with the PCB. By the way, D104 and D105 are acting as an over current protection, as well as a thermal compensation, so there is no any temperature sensing component on the heat sink. Believe it or not, the original amplifier is unbelievably cool…
Attached Files
File Type: zip studio 2 bg.zip (21.5 KB, 311 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007, 02:16 AM   #10
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
lumanauw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
Send a message via Yahoo to lumanauw
The input (most right part of schematic), is referenced to negative rail? Shouldn't the lower leg of R1601 (VR25K) is connected to ground?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Class D Vs Class I (Balanced Current Amplifier) rmsaudio Class D 29 26th January 2014 10:25 PM
Class A Amplifier Jean-Paul_2 Solid State 22 21st June 2009 02:36 PM
Questions about how to decrease the PASS A-40 amplifier into a class AB amplifier. novtango Pass Labs 2 21st October 2002 01:50 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:51 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2