|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Newcastle
|
The balanced to unbalanced converter at the front end of my Perreaux 8000C comes stock with a TL074 quad opamp (only using 2 out of 4 channels) installed.
I decided to try some upgrades to it: TLE2074 - listed by TI as a significant upgrade to the TL074 - staging was a bit more accurate and bass sharper, but sonically sounded really quite similar to the TL074 When I first installed the OPA4134, it distorted at high preamp volume levels, and the LME49740 distorted at low levels. Fault traced to the Perreaux 1985 method of power supply to the balanced line reciever - dropping +/-112V to 15V using a resistor and Zener. Using the stock resistor, current flow was limited to around 14ma and both the OPA4134 and LME49740 idle at around 20ma. Resistor value was dropped to allow more current flow and problem was solved. OPA4134 - installed with a DIP-SOIC adapter. Opened out the soundstage and brought in the "laidback Burr Brown sound". Some complain of tubby bass but the bass is really not at all tubby with the Perreaux output stage driving my speakers (11" Focal bass drivers). The real strength here is the timbre of the instruments. My wife (an ex-orchestral musician) came down to the listening room saying that my system was tolerable for the first time ever. LME49740 - this is a new National low noise opamp release this year and I decided to give it a run. Bass was slightly cleaner than the OPA4134, but trebles verged on sibilant - I suspect many would call this "accurate" After extended listening, I have left the OPA4134 in. The timbre of the instruments is so much closer to live music in my system than most systems that I have listened to. The LME49740 sounded cleaner initially and more detail was immediately apparent, but the treble was too prominent in my setup. I guess the next thing will be to try something like the OPA627 or possibly the new OPA827, as I seem to like the Burr Brown sound best. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
|
I found exactly the same with the dual versions of those I.C.s as regards SQ. For that same reason I am using a SOIC OPA2134 in my PC soundcard instead of the LM4562
SandyK |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Ztan,
try using a dual with a convertor to fit the 14pin DIL. The two channels will run a little bit cooler and take less out of the resistor/Zener combination. Once you have the two channel conversion sorted, that opens up the chip options. Check to see if unity gain stability is required. Most duals are stable but there are a few that are not eg. opa2228.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Newcastle
|
Quote:
Anyone tested the OPA827 prototypes yet? |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LME49600/LME49740 Headphome Amp | theAnonymous1 | Solid State | 28 | 31st January 2010 03:25 AM |
| Burnt my finger - OPA4134 | Ridin '24'z | Chip Amps | 8 | 11th April 2008 11:11 PM |
| OPA4134 x TL074 - Sound Differences | -_nando-_ | Chip Amps | 22 | 1st August 2007 07:28 PM |
| WTB:LME49710 and LME49740 | Ryssen | Swap Meet | 5 | 4th June 2007 08:38 PM |
| Replacement for tl074 | puppyslugg | Parts | 0 | 4th June 2002 09:00 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08243 seconds (72.52% PHP - 27.48% MySQL) with 10 queries |