|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
If you had a cathode follower with say, a largeish transistor, 1k load and 100v rail with the transistor biased to half the voltage swing, wouldn't the comparatively small voltage swings of the output signal be very low distortion because you're only using a small amount of the transistor's transfer function? In the 0.001% range perhaps?
This might be something for people who don't like opamps or lots of feedback, I don't know, I'm just musing really. The headroom would be huge and there would be no chance of clipping... There wouldn't be slew rate distortion associated with slow opamps either... Has anyone ever tried this? |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help in adjusting Vout in the power supply of the "Brute force in a line stage" by Er | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 30th May 2006 07:47 AM |
| Cathode follower distortion results | ashok | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 20th October 2004 01:19 AM |
| Question about direct coupling a anode follower into a cathode follower. | G | Tubes / Valves | 45 | 29th July 2004 06:47 PM |
| Help on Brute force | Ryssen | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 2nd May 2004 10:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06561 seconds (63.78% PHP - 36.22% MySQL) with 10 queries |