Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th January 2003, 04:55 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Question Remote transformer for power amp

I am wanting to separate a transformer (1200VA) from the rest of my power amp. Three questions:

1) Can anyone recommend suitable connectors to connect the separated transformer (in its own frame) to the rest of the linear supply in the amp frame?

2) Best arrangement for interconnecting cable (twisted, shielded, doesn't matter, etc)?

3) Are there any issues to be wary of (e.g. reactance of link between secondary and bridge rectifier)?

Reasons for separation:
a) more space in amp frame
b) less weight
c) less noise
d) safer (no mains in amp frame)

Thanks

Jamie
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2003, 05:11 PM   #2
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
James,

What power is the amp?

What is the voltage? So we can determine the current.

How many supplies? Eg + G - G...

Cheers,
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2003, 05:30 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
10x LM3886, fairly lightly loaded. Mains is 240V, rails +-30V & 0V, (24V secondaries), 2x 56000uF smoothing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2003, 11:47 PM   #4
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Jamie,

Firstly, sorry about getting your name wrong before.

Next: This is not a trivial problem.
IMO Your amp chips would become unstable with a great length of cable.
So, you'll need the smoothing caps in the amp case.
But, then you'll get reverse recovery noise from the rectifiers radiated. The way round this would be to either split the smoothing betweent the PSU and Amp, or to put the rectifier also in the amp. You'd still need to take special precautions against recovery noise.

Not very positive really..sorry.

Best hope from a reply from someone who's actually done it. Rather than a "theoratician".

Cheers,
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2003, 12:33 AM   #5
paulb is offline paulb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
Put caps in both the power supply box and the amp box. The big pulses coming from the bridge rectifier to the first cap are best confined to the power supply box, rather than running through the cable that runs between the boxes.
Rod Elliot also recommended a small value of resistance between the 1st and 2nd set of capacitors. My thoughts were that the cable itself would provide some resistance, and may be enough.
I used old surplus military connectors for power connections between the two boxes. The ones we used to call 'infinite-turn'. They're ugly but reliable and can handle a lot of amperage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2003, 08:47 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Thanks Paul.

Are Rod's recommendations to be found on his site, or were these made to you / or a thread here. I would be interested to read more on this.

I had planned just to separate the transformer, as I felt the link from the transformer to the bridge was far less critical than having a break somewhere else.

However, I can see the benefit in isolating the bridge and first smoothing caps. That said, intuitively I would have thought you wanted to minimize resistance between caps, as this surely will increase charging time?

Also, is there any implication for the star ground point of such a separation. Obviously, the star would need to be taken off the join of the second set of caps. Is the resistance back to the join of the first set significant?

Thanks

Jamie
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2003, 10:41 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 6
Default Remote transformer

Jamie,

From my own experience: you DO want some resistance (or at least L) between the caps in the xformer box and the caps in the amp box. You want to increase charging time (just a little, of course) to decrease higher harmonics that would be radiated. The higher harmonics come from very short, high and sharp charging pulses. So, don't make those cables too fat.

The star ground is very important. Since you have just a single supply, run it up to the amp and make a star point where the loads return (speaker cold), and run separate earths from each amp to this point as well. How are your inputs configured? Separate sources, mixing console? Especially with multiple amps, there a lot of opportunity for ground loops.

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2003, 11:29 AM   #8
paulb is offline paulb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
Quote:
Originally posted by Jamie F

Are Rod's recommendations to be found on his site, or were these made to you / or a thread here. I would be interested to read more on this.
I had emailed Rod to ask him about this arrangement with his P3A amp. I have larger caps in the amp box:
"Try using a 0.1 ohm resistor between the "little" input caps and the big ones. Minimal voltage drop, but a surprising reduction in ripple and mains noise."
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2003, 12:12 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Thanks for the quote Paul.


Jan, thank you for your help. You are right that the star grounding is important. I've been having a lot of trouble with this. The power amp is being fed from active filters. To try to solve bad buzz on certain channels, I implemented ground-compensated interconnects. This didn't help much. Investigating the noise further (terminated inputs), I seemed to be getting something related to charging pulses on the noisy outputs. I also implemented Nelson Pass's suggested .1uF caps across the rectifier diodes - do these really make a difference when a 56000uF is sucking current to recharge? (I didn't notice any improvement).

I connected each input from the filters straight to each amp module, then a thick 0V back to the star point. Initially I had speaker returns going to each module, then changed this to have them going to the star. Each module - star 0V connection is the same length.

I don't have a mains ground loop. The electronics in the whole system is only connected to chassis & safety earth in the power amp, via a network. Disconnecting / shorting this makes no difference.

This is why I want to isolate the power supply, without compromising the low impedance of the rails.

Jamie
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2003, 03:04 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 6
Default Hum

Jamie,

Just a gut feeling, really, but I doubt that remoting the transformer will solve it. Before heavily investing in cables & connectors, I would just try it out with a temporary set-up (unless you want to do it anyway of course).

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remote turn-on for power amp jwb Solid State 13 10th March 2008 09:05 AM
Remote power switch Dan2 Power Supplies 10 11th February 2008 12:02 PM
power amp remote turn-on wayne325 Pass Labs 2 28th July 2006 11:50 PM
Remote Power Supply dieselpower Chip Amps 1 22nd January 2005 09:06 AM
remote power for preamp ultrachrome Power Supplies 1 18th November 2004 09:11 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio