|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: toronto
|
I've always liked tubes, but tube amps are too expensive for me at this point, and besides I like SS too. Recently I read that a good portion of the "tube sound" has to do with the lower damping factor and output impedances characteristic of tube amps and that one way to lower a solid state amp's output impedance is to insert some resistance on the speaker leads. Apparently Bob Carver used this technique to fool many experienced listeners into thinking they were hearing tube amps. While I had no pretentions of sounding "just like a tube amp", i figured SOMETHING would happen and I had to find out for myself....who knows, maybe it would slightly tubelike.
Some people seem pretty philosophically opposed to this, but i figured it couldn't hurt to try. I'd been told to try resistance anywhere from 0.5 to 2R as long as the resistors were rated for 10 watts or more...as luck would have it i had four 4R3 10w non-inductives laying around from a speaker zobel that never materialised so i just paralleled two of them per speaker to get ~2.2 ohms and incidentally a higher power rating. I used my old Superscope receiver, already a relaxed and warm-sounding amp and an old pair of sealed Wharfedale 3 ways. As I expected the difference was noticeable but not huge and primarily affected the bass response, which sounded smoother and livelier...like it was less effort for the amp, you could say. this was good, but i found the midrange to be clearer and punchier, maybe even a bit more revealing since I found it easier to pick out sounds that were normally more easily picked out on headphones. I liked it although not surprisingly there is a slight reduction in sound output level, nothing i couldn't fix by turning the volume up a little more. I am not sure if i would call the sound more "tubelike" yet because i need to listen more. two non-audiophile housemates of mine immediately and seperately commented that it sounded clearer. My question is, who else here used series resistance with their speakers? what are your thoughts on this technique, and drawbacks? I like this cheap mod and i'd like to build future amp projects with an in/out switch to control the resistance. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Bright idea. You can make it even closer by using of tube preamp, see the image.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
JLH in his 75W BJT design used 0.22R WW resistor on the output.
Naim did the same in some of their amps. The serial resistor dramatically decrease DF of amplifier. Any other effect that comes to your minds? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Protection, I see no other reason to use series resistor, unless one wants to worsen sound. It may help to broaden response of certain bass drivers (change of Qel), but is highly urecommendable for midrange and highs.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
In principle a wirewound resistor at the output does the same as a Thiel-network. But the serial resistor's inductivity is lower than Thiel's coil's. And paralel resistance is higher.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Hmmm... Thanks, smart thought.
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Depends on Qts of driver and box volume, for low Qts drivers you can get few dB. The question is why not to design the box properly, no resistor is needed then.
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .
|
Quote:
Speaker with nominal impedance of 8 ohms, peaking up to 20 ohms at the fundamental resonance. Using bikehorn's 2.2 ohms in series, we get an average attenuation across the band of 2.1dB. At resonance, the attenuation will be 0.9dB. So, the boost is 1.2dB in this case. With lower impedance drivers, the effect will be greater of course. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wharfedale Tweeters - WxxD Series "Amethyst" Diaphragm | ARRAY | Swap Meet | 1 | 17th July 2010 05:08 PM |
| schematic variation and sim results of Pass "X" series US pat 5376899 | tiefbassuebertr | Pass Labs | 13 | 30th July 2009 08:33 PM |
| PPI ART Series a404 "v" PPI Powerclass pc450 swap | chemhaz | Car Audio | 2 | 21st November 2008 02:23 PM |
| MENG Series "EL34B" Integrated Amplifier | stevenscoffee | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 8th July 2008 07:10 AM |
| Is it possible to get "tube sound" with just a tube preamp and chipamp output? | Spasticteapot | Instruments and Amps | 43 | 15th May 2006 05:28 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12019 seconds (82.23% PHP - 17.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |