Using RMAA v6 for power amplifier distortion tests - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Software Tools

Software Tools SPICE, PCB CAD, speaker design and measurement software, calculators

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd November 2010, 01:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default Using RMAA v6 for power amplifier distortion tests

I set up RMAA for mono mode, and looped the soundcard output to its input. I got figures of THD=0.004%, IMD=0.018%

If i now test an amp etc, can i just subtract the above figures to give me the amps true values?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2010, 01:30 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany and www.aca-vogel.de
No ! This numbers told you only the resolution of your hardware. You cannot get better, even a straight wire (as you have already done) get's no better result. This distortion of your soundcard covers the distortion from your DUT and you won't be able to know (or even extrapolate) how much your DUT is below this values......
__________________
Designing audio electronics isn't a job, it's a mission
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2010, 05:37 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
Yes. But...

If you measure a THD of 0.4% (2 orders of magnitude above the floor) then subtracting 0.004% doesn't make a significant difference.

If you measure a THD of 0.04% (1 order of magnitude above the floor) then subtracting 0.004% stilll doesn't make a very significant difference.

If you measure a THD of 0.008% (twice the floor) then subtracting 0.004% makes a significant difference, but you should have less confidence in the result. You are approaching the measurement limit of your equipment. You can swap backwards and forwards between the DUT and the plain wire, and if the results are consistent, this will increase your confidence in the result, but your confidence would be improved with new equipment with a THD floor of 0.0004%, n'est ce pas?

If you measure a THD of 0.004% (at the floor) then you can only say that the DUTs performance exceeds that of the measuring equipment..

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2010, 08:51 PM   #4
macboy is offline macboy  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
The interesting thing about distortion is that each harmonic could be at any phase wrt the fundamental. The phase of each distortion product could be at any phase in the soundcard and in the DUT. You can't be sure whether they will constructively add or destructively add (subtract). So if you measure 0.009% on the DUT and 0.004% with soundcard only, the best you can say is that the THD of the DUT is 0.009% +/- 0.004%. It could be as low as 0.005% if the soundcard distortion is completely in-phase with the DUT distortion, so they add completely. Or the DUT THD could be as high as 0.013%, with the soundcard distortion completely out of phase so that it actually cancels out some of it during the measurement.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2010, 10:05 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
Good point macboy...

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2010, 09:20 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by macboy View Post
So if you measure 0.009% on the DUT and 0.004% with soundcard only, the best you can say is that the THD of the DUT is 0.009% +/- 0.004%.
If this is the case, for most people this will be ok to tweak their designs etc.

Also i am now using RMAA v5 (use left channel in and out), as this is giving more consistant results than v6 in my setup, and i suggest allowing the PC(soundcard) to warmup by 15mins and also the DUT.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2010, 06:41 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany and www.aca-vogel.de
To get an better oscillator, see here:
http://www.ac-vogel.de/AudioMSys/APN...distortion.pdf
To get a better Input search for (analog) "Notch" filter, also search Google for
"differential bridged notch".
If intersted, I can tell you how to tune it (by formula).
__________________
Designing audio electronics isn't a job, it's a mission
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2010, 07:19 PM   #8
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Thanks for the link to your article.

I wish to draw your attention that Bob Cordell has published in 1981 already his design of a THD Analyser where he also used a State Variable Filter.

http://www.cordellaudio.com/papers/thd_analyzer.pdf

Gruß,
Patrick
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2010, 07:43 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany and www.aca-vogel.de
But Bob has never the chance to use LM4562/LMExxx Opamps ! Nor has he measured the performance possible.....
__________________
Designing audio electronics isn't a job, it's a mission
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2010, 09:18 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry8 View Post
Also i am now using RMAA v5 (use left channel in and out), as this is giving more consistant results than v6 in my setup

Sorry, i change my view. In my setup neither v5 or v6 gives consistant results....i was only testing for THD at the time, and were consistant to +/- 0.001%, but when i also started to do IMD onetime i got 0.154 and redoing the test got 0.077.

As a last test i changed values in my amp which should alter THD but i kept measuring the same THD???

RMAA displays 4 test results at a time, maybe this is not showing the true results but showing the last one???
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opamp distortion tests posted sendler Solid State 4 27th December 2008 08:00 PM
Articles on Inductor Distortion Tests? PB2 Multi-Way 2 7th September 2008 04:57 AM
New Scan-Speak D3004/660000 Distortion Tests Joe Rasmussen Multi-Way 60 3rd December 2007 10:07 PM
ScanSpeak 4" midrange (12M_4631G00) Distortion Tests Tenson Multi-Way 12 22nd April 2007 03:09 AM
How accurate is RMAA distortion measurement? analog_sa Tubes / Valves 20 24th May 2004 12:25 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2