|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Software Tools SPICE, PCB CAD, speaker design and measurement software, calculators |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#281 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It's easy to try, right? Don't you have a spare 8R and 10uF or similar lying around?
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#282 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
It is a new type of bending wave transducer. Manufacturers of bending wave transducers would surely be glad to have something which comes even close. And they would surely be glad if they knew how to achieve the properties. Several materials are posible, but its too early now for details ... It was just "the current speaker under test". Kind Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Attached graph shows some speakers in the same room but
different positions. Positions and room are both suboptimal. RED: Bookshelf Speaker with ribbon tweeter, measured slightly below the tweeter axis, should better be above. Free standing, needs closer rear wall or bookshelf, too less bass in that position. BLUE: Bending Wave Transducer Side wall too near. GREEN: Dipol 08 Line Array Mike sould be somewhat higher on ear height. Rear / side wall is too near. No subwoofer, 1 satellite only. But nevertheless: The Bending Wave Transducer has lowest bass extension, smoothest phase rotation, lowest distorsion and the smoothness of FR is at least on the same level with the "conventional colleagues". The top end roll off can be fixed easily like mentioned before. Not to mention is has the smoothest dispersion in the highs. Kind Regards Last edited by LineArray; 5th July 2010 at 05:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#284 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
|
Attached is the test I promised in another thread showing the 400 hz phase inversion.
Also, is the impulse response acceptable? I'm not sure what's good and not good on this measurement parameter. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
|
Is there a manual for use? Is this software easy to use compared to REW? REW seems to be a pain with calibration of the soundcard....
Any info is greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
|
I need to be clearer. Sorry.
No directions with setup of mic and soundcard. Useable mics and soundcards. Can I use a R.S. meter? |
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Doesn't this - http://www.holmacoustics.com/downloa...eUserGuide.pdf tell you what you need to know?
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Oh, OK. You "can" use a Radio Shack meter, but it's not a great idea. Better to get one of the Dayton or Behringer calibrated mics. A USB soundcard with phantom power will set you up to go.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HOLMImpulse: Measuring Frequency- & Impulse-Response | askbojesen | Software Tools | 759 | 20th November 2011 05:42 PM |
| Practice Amplifier | thespeakerguy | Instruments and Amps | 21 | 24th August 2008 07:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10753 seconds (80.38% PHP - 19.62% MySQL) with 11 queries |