|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Software Tools SPICE, PCB CAD, speaker design and measurement software, calculators |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#931 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
your fft plot looks like you need to improve the "noise" floor
use max time step < (analysis length)/(fft bins) use a window - I like Blackman - you do need >4x fft length to reslove the frequency components (more than 4 periods of the lowest frequency component) use integer number of periods of both frequencies in .tran length or a really long record and good window if you have turn-on settling issues you may need to allow some sim time before collecting data for the fft (tstart) its possible to do very complex "analysis" with behavioral sources performing math on the waveform: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...37#post1333137 the basic pattern could be used as a basis for a 2-tone signal analysis the sidebands in the residual after subtracting the test tones could be rms summed for a % output I've mentioned earlier that the IMD could also be separated into "AM" and "FM" components |
|
|
|
|
#932 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
change the scaling in the graph to log scale rather than db. calculate the RMS sum of the distortion components and divide by the RMS sum of the test tones. then multiply the result by 100.
__________________
Vintage Audio and Pro-Audio repair ampz(removethis)@sohonet.net spammer trap: http://www1284177414881.v-dc.net/ |
|
|
|
|
#933 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
In this case I have start a new threat:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...82#post1914082 perhaps one of you knows good brand names of such personal computer measure systems for transistor analysing and p-spice modelling |
|
|
|
|
#934 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For those who's interest goes beyond spice and its various brands, I can recommend 'FEMM', written by David Meeker. As summarized in the manual:
"FEMM is a suite of programs for solving low frequency electromagnetic problems on two-dimensional planar and axisymmetric domains. The program currently addresses linear/nonlinear magneto-static problems, linear/nonlinear time harmonic magnetic problems, linear electrostatic problems, and steady-state heat flow problems." Although I'm using it for designing something else than audio gear (i.e. a hub motor for my e-bike) I think it might be useful for simulating some audio components as well. Think of inductors, heat sinks, speaker magnets or maybe even a direct drive motor for turntables. For more info see: Finite Element Method Magnetics: HomePage Not unimportant, it's free! (some commercial programs cost over $10000) Below a picture of the magnetic induction inside a BLDC motor designed for my e-bike. Regards, Edmond.
__________________
Een volk dat voor tirannen zwicht, zal meer dan lijf en goed verliezen dan dooft het licht…(H.M. van Randwijk) |
|
|
|
|
#935 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
in this case this thread could be of interest
Transistor modeling - how do I generate P-Spice Parameter ? |
|
|
|
|
#936 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
I have a question for you guys. Working on a simulation for the output end of an amp, running with 50v rails, I found the output transistors reaching high hfe at this voltage. (I was driving a 1r3 load) I was using Andy_c's mjl3281 models for the outputs. To back check these results, I ran the simulation from Andy_c's website with VCE set to 50v. At this setting the transistors showed hfe of about 228 at 10A. Is this a believable number? Does hfe rise with voltage? Thanks Ken |
|
|
|
|
#937 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
The short answer is yes, hfe rises with voltage for a BJT. This is the Early effect. The higher reverse voltage across the base-collector junction increases the size of the depletion region, encroaching on the base and making it thinner. Thinner base usually increases hfe. For your specific case, the number you are seeing for hfe seems high, especially at that current where you would expect some beta droop. Some models have odd sensitivities to certain variables under certain conditions. Check with Andy_c on this. He can probably shed some light on it. I don't have that model in front of me, but the first thing I would look at is the value of BF. BF is usually higher than peak beta of a transistor. However, if it is more than a factor of two higher than peak beta, I have sometimes discovered that the model has some undue sensitivities. Cheers, Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#938 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
|
Quote:
During that discussion on bjt ft, I checked quite a few of the models I had for ft and hfe versus freq/voltage. Most of the models appeared pretty optimistic WRT hfe. Once the VCE was increased the Hfe became -very- optimistic and beyond what I have measured in most real devices. I didn't do a thorough model versus reality check at various volatges but it was just an observation. Needs further investigation. cheers Terry |
|
|
|
|
|
#940 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A variac, rectifier and filter caps should work, and use an opamp to keep the desired current constant through the transistor, and measure Ib through a base resistor.
I'll bet that will work for simple stuff. - keantoken
__________________
Contribute to the DIYAudio WIKI! http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/every...p-sign-up.html LTSpice wiki with special attention to new users' troubles |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help with Spice simulation | overmind | Everything Else | 4 | 23rd December 2002 05:58 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.66445 seconds (11.21% PHP - 88.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |