| Reccomend a box for this driver - Click HERE for Original Thread |
| greg_mcquaid |
Hi,
I would like to know what box you guys would reccomend that would get me down to 20hz using the following driver:
Re: 3.7 ohms
Le: 1.30 mh
Fs: 23.5 Hz
Qms: 2.73
Qes: 0.416
Qts: 0.361
Vas: 61.6 Ltr
Mms: 232 g
Cms: 0.35 mm/N
Sd: 468.7 Cu Cms
Bl: 17.46 T-M
Xmax: 15mm
I hope the driver is pretty good as it is cheap and available on my side of the pond.
atb,
greg |
|
|
| sreten |
Hi,
what is the driver ? some very good numbers there, may not be right.
:)/sreten. |
|
|
| sreten |
Hi,
well according to the numbers its an excellent driver - but who
sells it ?- I can't see anywhere on Bk site where you can buy it.
:)/sreten. |
|
|
| GM |
Greets!
It may be OK, but the long vent's pipe harmonics won't be completely damped by flaring the ends, so they may need additional damping, which will lower output somewhat, so I'm thinking a lower tuned ML-TQWT may be a better alignment overall, though a bit larger:
L = 101"
SO = 200"^2
SL = 19.635"^2
zdriver = 6"
zport = 98.5"
Folded up, both the driver and vent cutout will be at floor level for max boundary gain. Sim shows minimal stuffing, so adding more further smooths it and rolls off the bottom end if it sounds too 'boomy' in-room.
GM |
|
|
| GM |
| As opposed to this 45" high bottom firing sim using your alignment with the same amount of stuffing, though it doesn't show any damping due to any vent flaring: |
|
|
| sreten |
| quote: | Originally posted by greg_mcquaid
s
Am i on the right track?
Thanks,
Greg |
Hi,
Just my opinion but flat alignments can sound boomy, I like to tune
the ports lower than that that gives flattest response, but each to
there own - possibly get an adjustable port and try in situ.
:)/sreten. |
|
|
|
|