Audio Project Amplifier Speaker Loudspeaker Kit
diyAudio.com diyAudio Forums Archive > Top > Source > Digital
 
Capacitor topology after Regulators... - Click HERE for Original Thread
weissi
Hi there!

Iīm facing the following problem: I have dozens of Panasonic FC 680ĩF/16V.... Tested them in my PC-Soundcard(12V/-12V filtering, after regulators at the DAC(WM8770) and at the opampīs) With them I got really fantastic results with the "unreal" RMAA-test...
I donīt give much about this test (SNR improved by 4dB?? THD+N also...) BUT: It also does sound fantastic!

So, the Problem: you know, all datasheets tell us to use "small" caps after regulator, ~<10ĩF, to keep the dynamic stabilisation...

Do you think thereīs a problem when putting them after regulators (7812/7912/TL413)
I plan to build another TDA1541A DAC with plenty of them, as I have them :-) My approach is: [100nF 0812] || [680ĩF FC] at all decoupling points.... and ~10 of them paralleled at every rail in the PSU

P.S.: Are they better than OS-CON in analog systems? OS-CONīs made the sound really harsh...

Regards,
max weissi
weissi
OK, the more you (I) read the more you (I) know....:xeye:
wazzup
What did u read?
jean-paul
Using ultra low ESR caps directly *behind* the regs is not wise to do. Not with 78xx and 79xx series anyway. Do a Search here for details ( keyword : ESR ) as it has been discussed even more than cable directionality...
weissi
I read some appīnotes from ONsemi.....

So, it primary depends on the output stage of the regulator... In the case of 78xx, and 317 itīs a NPN transistor that should be unconditionaly stable - no matter what type of cap is used....
LDOīs require more investigation for choosing the right capacitor, because they typicaly work in a more unstable area of the output stage (therefore typical a PNP).
weissi
But I think the appīnote describes only DC-~100Hz
Donīt know how that is at MHz... when a 78xx runs out of gain...
The main thing is that it works... Iīll try some other capīs aswell, anyone using Rubycon ZL? they are much cheaper than FC
EE_Mark
The regulaors don't like to see a lot of capacitance on their outputs or they can oscillate because of the inductance of their outputs. You can put a small value resistor, like 1 ohm (how much current is flowing?) between the regulator output and a giant cap and you won't have any problems.
Jocko Homo
All of those 3-terminal jobs have a feedback loop, and just throwing any old cap......especially with low ESR is asking for problems. It affects phase margin, and can easily make an oscillator. As you have found out.

Those of you with access to a spectrum analyzer.....here's what you do.

Look at the noise vs frequency with several different value and types of caps. You will see how the noise will peak at some frequency if you pick the wrong one.

If you don' t have an analyzer, but do have a 'scope and a square wave source.............drive the output with the square wave, and see if it rings. If it rings a lot, you have stabilty problems

Jocko
weissi
Well, I do have access to something that has a FFT function... But it might bre that it hasnīt enough bandwith for really serious measurements....

http://www.rapid-tech.com.au/dl708e.htm

But that thing looks quite prominent to someone (actually, this was one of a reason why I choosed my actual occupation, hehe, beside the metcalīs and the microscopes for soldering SMD...)
wazzup
So what values are we talking here? Is a low esr 1000uf Not a good thing behind a regulator? Or are even smaller values causing trouble?

I have build my ps, for my cd pro2 mechanism, using this schematic, using lm317t`s for regulators.

I don`t have acces to a scope, so I have to just build it correct, if anyone have advise on the caps behind the regulator, plz share it!
weissi
Hi!

I refered to a size of ~680ĩF, no big difference to 1000ĩ as this values *are* much higher than suggested in datasheets....
As much as I can say this time, standard regulator should not face any troubles with that high values, in terms of oscillation....
For some appīs and under certain conditions, the power-on delay time might be to long....

As sayed before, this does not apply to LDOīs, they are (as far as I know now...) more sensitive for output capacitance....
But I donīt use LDOīs, so why should I care....
Also, be sure that the input voltage is in any circumstance higher than the output voltage (in the case you power down) as regulators donīt like that *g* - a 1N4001 helps... see the datasheets...

:rolleyes:
jackinnj
quote:
Originally posted by wazzup
I have build my ps, for my cd pro2 mechanism, using this

I hope you are alive after burning circuit boards with his methodology. Maybe there is never any humidity in Italy.
wazzup
Could u be more specific jackinnj? Are you referring to the schematics, or the set up he uses?

Page generated in 0.045789957046509 seconds with 17 queries,
spending 0.01836205 doing MySQL queries and 0.02742791 doing PHP things.

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin
Copyright Đ1999-2009 diyAudio.com