I've built it already, although slightly different version and p2p. Using with Shelter 901
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Indeed, shunt regulators worked very well for me. I'm using something similar to this: http://www.mneng.net/PDK_Shunt_Regulator_files/schematic1.pdf
Hi Peter,
I like the way you applied the regulator boards. I have thought about that some times, but didn't find out how to apply the final connections between the boards in case those are in the middle of said boards. This allows for a tight signal and V+/- routing. Nice!
Rüdiger
I like the way you applied the regulator boards. I have thought about that some times, but didn't find out how to apply the final connections between the boards in case those are in the middle of said boards. This allows for a tight signal and V+/- routing. Nice!
Rüdiger
Peter,
You indicate that you use 627/637 that raise two questions:
I asume 627 first stage and 637 second, correct?
Did you do any decoupling on the opamps
Thanks for the info.
Did you compare 27/37 with 627/637, if so what is your impression the significant difference?
Your geometrical solutions and machining skills always envy me.
It looks great (and probably sounds likewise)
Regards,
Michiel
You indicate that you use 627/637 that raise two questions:
I asume 627 first stage and 637 second, correct?
Did you do any decoupling on the opamps
Thanks for the info.
Did you compare 27/37 with 627/637, if so what is your impression the significant difference?
Your geometrical solutions and machining skills always envy me.
It looks great (and probably sounds likewise)
Regards,
Michiel
Yes, 627 is first. Due to a tight layout, there was no need for additional decoupling: BG STD 100/25 is the only cap I used per rail after regulator.
I didn't have a chance to compare 27/37 with 627/637 yet. I used OPA627 in a VSPS and it worked very well there, better than AD797.
I didn't have a chance to compare 27/37 with 627/637 yet. I used OPA627 in a VSPS and it worked very well there, better than AD797.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Analogue Source
- phonoclone 3 roll call