Nuforce STA200 Goldmund vs Chinese Design

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
So, I own a Nuforce STA200 stereo amplifier and in a week or so I will be in possession of Chinese designed stereo amplifier. I am happy with the Nuforce but took a flyer on this Chinese no-name rig. I love the looks of the Chinese rig and some of the design claims have me interested too. The claims of the Chinese rig:

1) Class A amp for the first 20 watts then Class AB from 20 watts to 200 watts.

2) Dual Mono design (two transformers etc..)

3) Current feedback design (not voltage feedback)

4) Omron relays to protect the speakers

5) ELNA Audio capacitors

6) 16 pairs of Toshiba 2SC5200/2SA1943 Transistors

The Nuforce STA200 is not a Dual Mono and it is a Class AB 80 watts per channel 8 Ohms. I have more money than brains so I am going to audition both and keep the one I like best taking a loss on one. The Nuforce was $500 delivered and the Chinese was $700 delivered

From what you can tell from these pictures, did I make a total mistake on the Chinese amp purchase or was the Chinese amp a reasonable upgrade over the Nuforce?

c0.PNG

c1.PNG

c2.PNG

c3.PNG

c4.PNG
 
Hi All... Thanks @CaptainSniffy for your comment. I will post my impressions when the Chinese amp arrives. I may even do a video if I get energetic.

However, can no one pass an opinion on this Chinese amp design? Please chime in positive or negative. I want your honest opinions. I am not thin-skinned. I want the truth. Thank you.
 
A little more heatsinking on the chinese amp wouldn't hurt if it really should do the 20 watts in class-a... Also the rectifiers are without any heatsinking - usually a no-go in class-a-amps cause the current flowing through the PSU is constantly at a high level and the recs will heat up rapidly. Especially the cap near by them wouldn't like it much.
I'm a little bit skeptical by nature about if the semis (and the caps...) are genuine.
Nevertheless I'm excited what your experience will be.
 
Thanks so much @nfsgame. That's just what I was looking for! I can, based on your observations, fashion "slip on" heat sinks made from copper sheeting to the rectifiers (insulating the bottom edge with electrical tape if need be). Also, I can place heat shielding (adhesive backed from the performance auto parts store) between the rectifiers and the first cap. And finally, I can add if needed small super quiet fans on either side of the amplifier chassis. I will only do this if, after measuring the temperature of the heat sink fins during operation. Any suggestions on the max temperature I should let the heat sink cooling fins get... anyone?

Mod-0.jpg

Mod-1.jpg

Mod-2.jpg
 
At 65°C-70°C at the heatsink near by the outputs some amplifiers will shut the unit down. Keep in mind that the outputs will already be derated in their SOA. A short thump-rule is that you'll have to keep your hand on the heatsink for at least 3-5 seconds. If you feel too much pain before the time has expired then the heatsink is too small for the heat it'll have to dissipate.
If you need insulators between rectifiers and coppersheet depends on the model of diode used. Some got the cathode/anode electrically connected to the baseplate, some not. If you clamp two diodes with connected baseplate on a conductive piece of something then :yikes:.
 
Thanks again @nfsgame! So, if the temperature is too high, I would be willing to sacrifice some of the power in the Class A section of each channel. This would require surgery! I could selectively remove transistor pairs until the temperature started dropping to an acceptable level? For example.... (please see red X's)... Too radical????

c3-B.png
 
Not just radical - it doesn't make sense. You'll lower the area the outputs are able to transfer the heat to the heatsink. So maybe the heatsink temperature would be lower, but as voltage on the rails, bias and load-current would be equal as before, the heat at the outputs would be the same. Just less spread over the output devices. So each output device will get hotter. Also the ability to drive low impedances is limited then (->SOA).
You perhaps could lower the bias to lower the heating of the output devices. But for sure you'll have to watch the distortion with an oscilloscope and waveform generator.
 
@nfsgame Thank you again for your comments and observations. I got the idea for removing some of the transistors on the A60+ from another schematic I found of a simpler lower power version of the A60+ that was called the A60. The A60 is supposedly 60 watts (per channel) and has 4 transistor pairs but looks identical to the A60+ in every other regard (from what I can tell). Based on your suggestions more cooling is probably the best option instead of surgery on the circuit if I have a heat problem.

Now I am considering the design for the fabrication of the rectifier heat sinks from the copper sheeting. Thanks again for your warning of potential shorts caused by the conductivity of the heat sink if not properly placed and secured.
 
Mod-3.jpg


So, I just ordered the stuff I need to fabricate the rectifier heat sinks from Amazon. About $30 which included a temperature gun for me to accurately determine the before heat sink and after heat sink thermal readings for various places on the amplifier PCB. I can also see if the heat shielding that I put between the rectifiers and the caps has a positive effect on the caps. Also, I will post the heat sink design here when I come up with it. This is for anyone who also gets this Chinese designed amp and wants to follow in my foot steps doing these improvements that have been suggested by nfsgame.
 
If I have the right rectifier(? won't know till I get the amp here), the Max operating temperature looks like 175 C. So, I will be able to test, using my new temperature gun what the existing rectifiers run at and maybe I don't have to do anything! Otherwise, I can fab prototype heat sinks and fit them in place and run the gun on the area to see if I've got them working right. In other words I can empirically test what I'm doing with the gun to see what really works and what doesn't.


Mod-7.jpg
 
Without knowing the construction I think it would be more something like four MUR3040/60 or anything of that kind. They are very common.
Keep in mind that your 175°C (or the 150°C for the MUR) are absolute maximum ratings. They are masively derated at that temperature, too (depending on type down to a few hundred milliamperes). Solder joints don't like that thermal stress either.
 
Thanks again nfsgame! You keep giving great information to keep me on the right track. I have found out more information from the manufacturer on the rectifiers used. If they are not lying, they appear to be of high quality and exhibit a very good derating profile. Working as intended up to about 140 C.

Mod-9.jpg

Mod-A.jpg
 
I received my new amplifier in yesterday. Super high quality! Machined aluminum face and titanium case. I immediately opened it and inspected the components to make sure there was no bait-and-switch. All was as advertised. The unit without active cooling runs hot (hotter then 85 deg F). So I bought an Aircom T10 cooling unit ($99) to draw the air through it and the T10 works like a champ. The sound is a wonderful upgrade to the Nuforce STA200. The Nuforce is history now. The new amp has more pronounced tighter bass, clearer vocals and the highs when listening to Miles Davis were shocking. The Chinese amp is a nice Cabernet Sauvignon and the Nuforce is a thin Merlot. Class A is the way to go. I am just expecting better and better sound as the amp breaks in too. I am very pleased for $700 + $100 (for the T10 cooler). Full disclosure the Nuforce was $500 so it was 60% more for the new setup.

Mod-A01.jpg

Mod-A02.jpg

Mod-A03.jpg

Mod-A04.jpg

Mod-A05.jpg

Mod-A06.jpg
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.