|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
|
What particular characteristic of a capacitor should I look for when selecting one for filter duty in a SMPS ?
There are capacitors that are Low ESR, Low Impedance,Inductance, HF (High frequency), etc.. My guess is that HF types (for high freq ripple) would be best suited but I am not completely sure. {edit}: this is a low power smps (cd player) and the final output voltages are regulated via regulators. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
Look for caps with low ESR at the switching frequency and high ripple current capability.
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
This is not a straight easy answer.... The output filter cap choice is dependent on many factors....
Many SMPS circuits, even new ones are poor designs... many designers have never advanced from 1980's SMPS technology(Unitrode era) and still continue to produce garbage and with very borderline loop stability... I still see large voltage mode switchers and i also still see low frequency switchers, anything under 300kHz.... It is many of these cases where you need the output cap to have large ESR..For example where the ESR ZERO will cancel the 2nd order pole and produce a -1 slope (-20dB/Decade).... Replace the output cap with a low ESR ceramic and you will create a screaching oscillator!!!! Most modern switchers would like to have low ESR ceramics on the output...but they do not come in large values given the voltage range....SOmetimes you need the electrolytics for the size and a few ceramics for bypass, depending on the output load... If you can provide more detailed infor on the SMPS you are working with as well as the power requirements.. Chris |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
|
well I am talking about the psu of the pioneer dv-563 player.
let me see if I can scan just the psu schematic page and post it tonight. I know people have already done some mods and I could just copy them but I want to run it by the "Power Supply" forum and get some expert opinions. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You should not modify a multi-output flyback (the topology employed in most DVDs, VCRs, TVs, etc...) Capacitor parasitistics (ESR) are often part of the desired frequency response of the output filter in these circuits, as it has been already pointed out.
You may consider additional common-mode filtering or output pi-filtering at best.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This is a hard one, and does not seem to include current limiting
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
I am unable to read the tiny print on the outputs...maybe you can clarify this for me...
It appears as Eva says...No current limit... It also appears that they used series pass regulation on the secondary side for a few of the output voltages... In these cases, you can add extra caps to those outputs.... But you would need to get out some equipment and measure the noise floor in the output voltages to get an idea where you need to make your improvements.... This is typical crappy power supply from the far east....This circuit was lifted from another design and the output reg was most likely horrible, so they attached some secondary series regs to "band-aid" the problem, which makes switcher efficiency take a nose dive.... It is a flyback....Probably a dis-continous mode ...which means they are probably not dealing with a (RHPZ) Right-Hand-Plane-ZERO.....adding extra output Caps on the not regulated outputs would push the pole lower and reduce loop gain at cross-over... You could de-couple the output with a large L then use a cap afterwards....need to verify the results...if you don't have fancy gear..you step response it and look at the over-shoot to get a rough idea if your safe... Chris |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
|
To my disappointment I replace more cheap standard electrolytics in SMPS than I like. Despite those clever engineers that design them they often use normal caps that blow from too high frequency/heat buildup or whatever. All too often I get the impression they just use a value they happen to have in stock.
Panasonic FM is a good choice.
__________________
It's only audio |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
|
Quote:
SW +12V E +6V (this one then goes to 3 other regulators. Two 3V and one 5V regulator) E +6V P_CONT EV +3.3V SW +1.8V GND GND GND GND -28V FLDC+ FLDC- Quote:
|
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| selecting ETD core for half bridge SMPS | jegandren | Power Supplies | 4 | 19th February 2008 04:09 PM |
| Selecting coupling cap for half-bridge offline SMPS | Pierre | Power Supplies | 21 | 23rd March 2007 07:09 PM |
| Need advice selecting a 2A3 design | lquintas | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 3rd October 2006 06:00 PM |
| General Preamp Design and help selecting opamp(long) | jteef | Solid State | 11 | 9th December 2001 02:22 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12756 seconds (77.22% PHP - 22.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |