|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
If I put 200V across a string of two 100k resistors, then put an electrolytic capacitor across one of the resistors and wait for the cap to charge. If the voltage across it is 95V, does this mean that the leakage current is equivalent to that of a 1M resistor, and can I assume for all intents and purposes that this cap has such a resistor across it?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, but due to the chemical nature of these capacitors, leakage current depends on things such as temperature and aging, and may not follow a linear relationship to applied voltage. In other words, don't rely on a particular leakage current value for electrolytic capacitors. Furthermore, leakage current changes also from unit to unit.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Thanks Eva,
I'm dealing with a 450V 180uF cap. Can I predict its condition through the amount of leakage current? (I have begun to re-form it and it seemed leaky to start with) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
Since becoming a member I have learned a few things about caps. The leakage you have found @ 200V (about 50uA) will probably be at least trebled by the time you raise the applied voltage to 400Vdc. If the cap was suffering excessive leakage then you need to reform it to at least it's final working voltage plus a margin for voltage variations. Otherwise heating due to excessive leakage will be cumulative with ripple and other heating effects. Finally, the change in ESR seems to be the best guage of life remaining in the cap. About a doubling from the spec value is a guide to end of useful life. I suspect that you could get some half decent performance when ESR is double and maybe a bit further. Some manufacturers test the ESR soon after a quick version of reforming. There appears to be some kind of relation here. I hope I have got this right.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Makes sense, thanks Andrew.
I'm having trouble identifying the cap. It is 1/3/8" wide and 2/3/8" tall. It appears to be CE rated. What would a rule of thumb acceptable leakage be? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
the leakage is often quoted as 0.01CV or 0.02CV You can calculate this @ 0.02*180*450*10^-6=1620uA=1.6mA Can someone jump in and confirm that the C in the formula is Farads? I have checked a few lower voltage caps, I have reformed, and they often leak at less than 5% of the formula projection.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Testing for cap leakage | taj | Parts | 15 | 7th October 2007 09:31 AM |
| Electrolyte Leakage? | TrevorK | Parts | 3 | 6th July 2006 04:44 PM |
| tantalum cap leakage? | AndrewT | Parts | 5 | 12th December 2005 11:35 PM |
| Transistor leakage? | Solid Snake | Solid State | 1 | 1st October 2003 09:48 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09508 seconds (62.46% PHP - 37.54% MySQL) with 10 queries |