
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
17th January 2006, 01:22 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal

Core saturation and flux density calculations
Hello everyone
I had built a small SMPS years ago, that puts out 15V 0.3A from the 120VAC line, and I was now trying to upgrade it to give twice the power (0.6A). The core ( a 12mm ferrite toroid ) starts to go into saturation at powers just above the original rated power. I have read in some places that increasing the number of turns can raise the saturation threshold (perhaps by lowering the core flux density?). So I'm considering increasing the primary turns from 100 to 200 (and the secondary accordingly) to hopefully keep this trafo from saturating at the higher poer levels. Is this assumption correct? I'm a bit confused by the theory, which states that: B, flux density = [Volts] [Seconds] / [Meters squared] [Turns] so, more turns, less flux density, OK so far. but H, magnetomotive force = [Amps] [Turns] / [Meters] so, more turns increases H But B and H are inexorably tied by the BH curve, so increasing H will bring B higher along on the curve, resulting in higher B, not lower B. The two equations seem conradictory. I'm sure math doesn't contradict itself, so what part of this am I getting wrong? thanks Pamela 
17th January 2006, 01:44 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member

make your life simple  go to your town dump, get a beat up ATX supply  take the ER core out  roast it in the oven (wrapped in aluminum foil  400 degrees for 45 minutes) and then gently pry apart  taking care not to break the bobbin or damage the two pieces 
this core should be capable of several hundred watts and is quite compact. if you have LABView (or can get a student edition) you can make a BH Curve tracer with a couple resistors and one capacitor  it's in the most recent issue of EDN (www.ednmag.com). that way you can characterize the core without scrambling to find a manufacturer's data sheet (which you probably don't have anyway.) i have posted a very simple and very acurate impedance measuring unit with which you can measure the inductance of the primary winding  search under STEBER  the fellow at Illinois University who wrote the software  
17th January 2006, 01:44 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005

The first equation has seconds in the numerator. This tells you that increasing the turns will increase the inductance and require longer (more seconds) to reach a given flux density.
So there is no contradiction. First law of engineering... nothing is free. You may need a bigger core. Core size is proportional to [L*I^2] / 2 This is the kinetic energy the core can "hold". You didn't mention your topology or what inductor/transformer you are talking about. You may be able to increase your switching frequency to increase power. Check application note #19 from Linear Technologies... specific to their part of course... but packed with info and equations. 
17th January 2006, 01:54 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member

oh, forgot  for pushpull applications (continuous) you can use this spreadsheet on my webiste:
http://www.techdiy.com/smps_xfmr.xls 
17th January 2006, 02:27 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal

Thanks
I will follow up on that Linear tech note. I don't have a shortage of larger cores. But this thing needs to fit into a constrained preexisting space. My original unit is about the size of a pack of gum. 
17th January 2006, 02:27 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal

Oh, yes..
the primary inductance is 1.1mH. Topology is forward with RCD reset. The 12mm toroid *is* the power transformer. The whole circuit is 2" x .75" x.75", smaller than a pack of gum, actually. I know about using a larger core, but I thought squeezing 10W instead of 5W from that core might not be such a big deal to ask of it. I mean, is it true that adding more turns can sometimes solve a saturation problem, or is that false? thanks Pamela 
17th January 2006, 03:13 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005

Increase your frequency and remove turns.
Look at the math... 
17th January 2006, 04:24 PM  #8  
diyAudio Member

You all are overlooking a simple fact:
In forward and pushpull converters, power output is not related to transformer saturation at all. If the transformer starts saturating above a certain power level, then there is something really wrong with the circuit. The only limiting factor in these circuits is output inductor saturation and I^2*R losses. Quote:
Given a fixed frequency and pulse length: Increasing turns decreases B proportionally to N'/N and increases magnetising L proportionally to N'^2/N^2. This means that the magnetising current gets also reduced by a N^2/N'^2 factor. So if we double N, in the H forumla '[Amps]' gets reduced to 1/4 and '[Turns]' gets doubled, so H is halved. 

17th January 2006, 07:45 PM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal

Eva:
Thank you for addressing my misunderstanding headon. So adding turns lowers B, while increasing H to a *LESSER* extent, still resulting in a net drop in flux density. I guess the price you pay is higher leakage inductance from the higher N... Thanks again Pamela 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
TS parameters when changing Flux Density  f4bok  MultiWay  4  24th December 2008 11:33 AM 
TS parameters when changing Flux Density  f4bok  Pass Labs  2  23rd December 2008 02:46 PM 
Toroidal core saturation  Klimon  Tubes / Valves  3  11th July 2006 01:59 PM 
Air core vs Solid Core .. saturation  Madmike2  Solid State  2  6th July 2005 04:28 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 