|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Close to Oistrakh
|
I'm about to finish an amp for my XLS's, and want to use two toroids of 500VA each that I have already. There are two XLS per channel, and there will be one power supply for both stereo channels.
Since this is for a sub amp, used only up to 110Hz, not only the capacitors value is important but the transformer size. So I'm thinking about paralleling the two little monsters and this is what I came up with. Has anyone build a similar thing?
__________________
What is beyond the speaker? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Ummm...
Why on Earth, Mars or Uranus would you need sixteen diodes? I'm highly confused on your reasoning here. Aside from that, paralleling transformers is a bad idea, even windings inside a single transformer. The slightest mismatch in voltage will cause a mild short-circuit current to flow between the windings themselves. If nothing else, the guaranteed different winding resistance will cause uneven current sharing. Constant-voltage elements do not like to parallel because they each have their own idea of what that voltage is. Now series, perfect. Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Close to Oistrakh
|
How would you parallel two power supply transformers?
PD : I'm replying from the moon...
__________________
What is beyond the speaker? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Simulpost will ya? While editing no less
![]() Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Close to Oistrakh
|
Wouldn't the bridges stop the currents to other secundaries?
__________________
What is beyond the speaker? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, but then one will supply all the current and the other might as well not exist.
Plus at worst you only need two FWBs following the "prevent backflow" logic. Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 65N 25E
|
If your trafos are identical, ie same manufacturer and model/batch I would try to wire them in parallei. You can easily check how well they work together by wiring them in parallei and checking primary current without any load. If it is much more than 2 times higher than single trafo prim current then they are not good match.
Then there is also current sharing problem, but if they are identical models winding resistances are probably better than 10% match. Not so big deal if another runs at 95% load and another 105%. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If empirical testing shows they aren't antisocial (i.e. they play well together
Make sure you match the same windings. If not bifilar (simultaneously) wound, one will be "higher" in the wind and as such longer, having more resistance. Voltage matching is your first priority though. Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Close to Oistrakh
|
The toroids I have are identical, at least they are the same RS code and were bought at the same time. So they will be more identical than different.
If I understood correctly from you all, this will not get fire out of the pcb, but I still have the last minute question... would be more the advantage of the of the lower output impedance of the transformers in parallel, than the possible problems I will have to solve (grounding loops) in the active system I'm finishing (because of the single PS)? Does anyone has a different suggestion?
__________________
What is beyond the speaker? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parallel Bridge? | rgrayton | Chip Amps | 16 | 20th January 2009 03:50 PM |
| Bridge Parallel AMP | myanmar | Chip Amps | 15 | 11th March 2007 09:02 AM |
| Bridge or Parallel? | Roushon | Chip Amps | 71 | 16th September 2006 06:47 PM |
| Bridge/parallel calculations?? | JDeV | Chip Amps | 5 | 24th January 2004 09:31 AM |
| parallel or bridge | rulezzz | Chip Amps | 1 | 8th January 2004 06:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10910 seconds (78.89% PHP - 21.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |