Bravo v2 Power supply design considerations

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Project is a 24v Bravo v2. No crazy mods yet, just the IRL510 + better lm317 swap


Trying to decide how I want to power this thing. I was thinking dual LM1084(Paralleled) and have been playing around in LTSpice with a design, but honestly not sure if I want to commit.


Question 1
How many amps does this thing pull, cranked without the modified lm317 circuits and with the changed adj resistance(increased voltage) of the lm317?


Question 2

Can I feed this with a +12/-12 type supply design using a regulator with the equivalent negative counterpart? Or am I asking for issues with tube heaters and other components?


Question 2a
Wouldn't it see "GND"(-12) as reference anyways? lol I think that is how that works.


Question 3
Toroidal transformer voltage! 120v(60Hz)
Let's say I go with a traditional +24/0 supply, what am I looking at for the transformer specs?

My calculations(probably wrong) are leading me to think about going for 20v(In parallel)load toroidal at about 35Va.

Question 4
Am I correct here:
20VAC x 1.414 = 28.3
28.3-(1.07x2) = 26.14VDC
This looks to be hitting the target vin-vout max of 1.5v of the LM1084's with a little room. Cutting it too close?


Diodes = BYV27-200
Toroid = ??? can't find a 20v toroidal transformer
An 18v seems to low, a 24v transformer is just too much any way I calculate it.
I do have a 24v toroidal, but the thing is a whopping 7amps.....

The conundrum.
Transformer voltage choice :)

Any insight would be greatly appreciated!
 

PRR

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
A link to the project would help folks who do not have all possible projects memorized.

Is this the $69 "tube" HP amp?

By inspection: the tube needs 12V 0.3A heat. The actual headphone amp could be several designs, but with those heatsinks shouldn't pull over 0.1A per channel, 0.2A. The plate current of 12AU7 is negligible. 0.3A+0.1A+0.1A= 0.5A; round-up to 0.6A DC. The AC Amps rating should be 1.8X or >1.1A; 1.5A may be a standard size.

It pulls what it pulls. Applying for high voltage burns-out the heater. Designing for high current is pointless. (OK, you want a few-second turn-on surge at 2A- most linear supplies tolerate this gracefully.)

18VAC gives 24V DC. If you can't make clean 12V out of twice that, then something else is wrong. 0.6A suggests >600uFd first filter cap. Since the voltage is high already, and will be regulated, I would not super-size that. 1,000uFd is a convenient value.

18VAC, 1.5A (27VA) AC, 1,000uFd, 10 Ohms 5 Watts, 1,000uFd, gives 18V ripple dips. An LM7812 can regulate that to 12V just fine. There is 3.6 Watts in the regulator so it needs a large heatsink, like 2"x3".

I have no idea why you would use dual +/- supplies. It is clearly intended for generic single 12V power. Tube plates are traditionally single-supply. Tube heaters are just light-bulbs and don't need multiple supplies.
 
A link to the project would help folks who do not have all possible projects memorized.

Is this the $69 "tube" HP amp?
That is the one, yes.
I'm actually running a 12AX7.


By inspection: the tube needs 12V 0.3A heat. The actual headphone amp could be several designs, but with those heatsinks shouldn't pull over 0.1A per channel, 0.2A. The plate current of 12AU7 is negligible. 0.3A+0.1A+0.1A= 0.5A; round-up to 0.6A DC. The AC Amps rating should be 1.8X or >1.1A; 1.5A may be a standard size.
The heaters are in stock config at the moment.
I do plan on running them in parallel with this R-78B6.5-1.0L at some point in time.


It pulls what it pulls. Applying for high voltage burns-out the heater. Designing for high current is pointless. (OK, you want a few-second turn-on surge at 2A- most linear supplies tolerate this gracefully.)
I agree that it pulls what it pulls, trying to spec for max current draw + headroom so the supply doesn't collapse.



18VAC gives 24V DC. If you can't make clean 12V out of twice that, then something else is wrong. 0.6A suggests >600uFd first filter cap. Since the voltage is high already, and will be regulated, I would not super-size that. 1,000uFd is a convenient value.
The Bravo v2 literally runs on 24v.
Linear regulators ALWAYS have supersized caps before them and after the rectification point. like 10k uF +, why say otherwise?



18VAC, 1.5A (27VA) AC, 1,000uFd, 10 Ohms 5 Watts, 1,000uFd, gives 18V ripple dips. An LM7812 can regulate that to 12V just fine. There is 3.6 Watts in the regulator so it needs a large heatsink, like 2"x3".
The Bravo v2 runs off 24v?
we can calculate heatsink requirements after I figure out what i'm running for the transformer.


I have no idea why you would use dual +/- supplies. It is clearly intended for generic single 12V power. Tube plates are traditionally single-supply. Tube heaters are just light-bulbs and don't need multiple supplies.
Not dual, just a split plus minus design, this thing doesn't have a "GND" so the negative voltage would be reference gnd anyways providing 24 volts?


Guess i'll post up my current supply design(not finished) to show what i'm talking about. It is not a split plane design.


Thanks for taking the time to respond, hopefully I cleared some things up. :)
 
Not sure how to edit my post, but here is the layout and "performance specs" lol

Red = Voltage after rectification.

Green = Voltage at LOAD.
Blue = Amp draw at LOAD. (this is maxed)


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Paralleled_LM1084_Forum.png
    Paralleled_LM1084_Forum.png
    57.1 KB · Views: 364
did you read that other Thread?
Help for PMillett HV regulator

and they linked to
High Voltage Regulator


I see a nfet reverse voltage protection(not needed) and R7 used to drop voltage before the lm317.

The problem with "high" voltage (24v) is that these regulators don't like much amp draw, so even if you use say, the discontinued LT1083 which looks like a nice big fat 7 amp draw capable regulator... in reality at such high voltage the amp draw these things are capable og go out the window...usually go under 1 amp. like 820ma.

Two load sharing regulators almost doubles the amperage capability and shares heat.
Those load balance resistors are probably going to be way too expensive to use, so I doubt I want to use this design.

Still floating around some ideas. *shrugs*
Thinking a +/- lm317/337
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.