Toroidal trans choice? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
View Poll Results: Which toroidal is better?
Antek 2 50.00%
Avel 2 50.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd November 2013, 02:38 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default Toroidal trans choice?

I was wondering if one is any better than the other. The Antek is cheaper but, how does it compare to the Avel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2013, 06:20 AM   #2
hongrn is online now hongrn  United States
diyAudio Member
hongrn's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
All I use are Antek toroids due to their incredible value. I also have an Avel toroid powering a LM4780 amp. As far as quality is concerned, Antek toroids are just as quiet, especially the AS models, in my humble opinion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2013, 11:05 AM   #3
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
As far as I know, copper = copper, insulation = insulation, iron = iron.
Therefore they are the same.
regards Andrew T.
Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2013, 11:38 AM   #4
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
richie00boy's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Now now Andrew, that's not like you. Where's the discussion about core material, what temperature rise the maker finds acceptable and how close to saturation they are running it?
__________________ my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, modules and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2013, 01:39 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
palstanturhin's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
And most important of it all!

  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2013, 11:31 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Umm...Poll shows 2 for the Avel and zero for the Antek. Based on the posts, I would have thought it would be closer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2013, 12:00 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
Michael Bean's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Umm...Poll shows 2 for the Avel and zero for the Antek.
Well...I've used both and two out of 7(?) Avels had mechanical buzzing, I think from loose windings. I replaced them with equivalent Anteks and the problem was gone. In my opinion the Anteks are not only less expensive, but superior quality. Their AS series has an inter-winding EMI shield and an external magnetic shield. They're hard to beat.

  Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2013, 10:53 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
I would have thought more people would have used both brands and have an opinion about each. The other thing that I found strange is that the posts seem to be in favor of Antek where as the poll favors Avel.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subbing Trans comish4 Solid State 2 6th January 2013 09:15 PM
WTB:Toroidal trans. with 2X 25-30VAC secondaries. vadimgal Swap Meet 4 18th April 2010 04:42 AM
how do I use this trans? whatsnext Solid State 5 11th September 2006 12:48 AM
Which trans wire is which? billinchile Tubes / Valves 18 17th September 2004 08:28 AM
Best Transformers (Encapsulated Toroidal or Open Frame Toroidal) Rixsta Pass Labs 10 23rd April 2004 04:41 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2