Unusual filtering scheme question - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th March 2013, 08:44 PM   #11
Elvee is offline Elvee  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Elvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITPhoenix View Post
Thanks jan. Are the "orange drops" considered low inductance--for this purpose
The 17W rating of the resistor means it is a wirewound type, making the type of capacitor, its inductivity or absence thereof irrelevant (and to generalize, the simple presence of a cap in this place)
__________________
. .Circlophone your life !!!! . .
♫♪ My little cheap Circlophone© ♫♪
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2013, 08:55 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York
Well, we were doing good there for a minute. This is for Rod Elliot's P27A, 100w, fully solid state guitar amp. I am using tubes for the pre, but will experiment with his power section. All I wanted to do was take it up a notch in performance. I am using a torroid with two 3,300uF in parallel. His minimum is 47,000 total for each rail.

I like the 100uF idea on the amp section since it may be of considerable distance from the power board. I would use at least 18 gauge wires to connect.

Since there are many unkowns in terms of transformer and capacitor selection specs, is there a usual method of determining the proper value of these components, or trial and error, watching the scope while in operation?

Last edited by ITPhoenix; 4th March 2013 at 09:14 PM. Reason: diction & addition
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2013, 09:24 PM   #13
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Calculation. See the thread on reservoir size in the power supplies forum.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2013, 11:09 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York
Thank you everyone for the answers. This is more involved than I thought. DF96, I see that thread is quite long. You even have a commentary on page 1, which serves as sort of a pointer to the calcs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 09:20 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canary islands
Ola' ITPhoenix
I think "orange drops" are not low inductance cap (no data in Vishay/Sprague tech sheet)
they are better suited in signal path if you like their sound.
I prefer Epcos MKP , Vishay MKP or Arcotronics Nissei Group R73 (better option).

Elvee
I am agree with you about wirewond resistor, for this purpose I am using thik film type ( like RS#239-2503 ) for better damping.

and a couple of tips for ITPhoenx : don't forget to twist the tranformer cables, two turn for inch for example ( important ) and place the Zobel/snubbers very close to diods ( more important...) to help stability on rails.

ciao
Marco
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 04:34 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York
Muchas gracias, Senor Bicefalo!

The writer recommends "film type" caps for these Zobel snubbers. It is true the calling for 17w begs wirewounds. I saw the film resistors in Mouser, and also "audio" wirewounds in the Ohmite catalog. http://www.ohmite.com/cat/res_audiogold.pdf

So for an hour or so I read the thread DF96 recommendeded for the reservior calculations. I actually meant calculations for these Zobel networks, but while these are for ripple and noise improvement, it appears total capacity has an effect on the actual sound, according to the myriad comments. My point here being, I am not sure if the Zobel values will apply if the total capacitance changes, and if it matters if toroid or EI effects the proper values, in addition to their inductances.

I am now tempted to go with a dual LM338 or LT1085s off separate windings and rectifiers to yield the rails. Practically no one says regulation of a SS power section benefits much from regulated, but in terms of PSRR and noise, it should work IF, and only IF, designed properly, as I understand.

I wind my own trannys so the outputs are unlimited. Oh, and thanks for the twisted AC wiring tip. I may have forgotten.... There are preamp tubes present.
__________________
Venturing where the wise refuse to go, may or may not yield great revelations theretofore unknown; either with considerable expense.

Last edited by ITPhoenix; 5th March 2013 at 04:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 06:36 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canary islands
Hi ITPoenix

Ohmite Audio Gold Resistors are not suited in snubber app.
Better option is Caddock MP930 ( very expensive, you have to add some heatsink too ) USA made and stocked by Mouser, or BPC series by BI technologies ( may be too fragiles for a mobile application...but very small ).
For exact value have a look at "Calculating Optimum Snubber_Hagerman Tecnolgies" in goggle, very complex reeding but with a couple pratical tips...

About regulated PSU in a class A/B amp, LM338/LT1085 are short of ampers, not good for a guitar amp in my opinion. With regulation you are going to loose some dinamics..
Better optoin shoud be a CRC configuration if you are worried about ripple reyection and diods noise. Calculate R value in way that 2 volts are lost between caps.

I hope this can help you...

ciao.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 07:05 PM   #18
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Sad to see a reputable company like Ohmite now producing 'audio grade' wirewounds. I guess business is business, though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 07:21 PM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York
Thanks. I saw another trick with the Aikido preamp power supply. For the HT supply, he adds series resistors to the rectifier diodes, which are fast and oversized. I seems the resistors diminish the switching noise/ripple since there are no bypass caps on the diodes. There is no huge H inductor, just caps and resistors. Well, it's only feeding (4) 12AX7s.

Speaking of series drops between caps, that is the way it's normally done with th HT guitar tube amps, so that by the time you get to the end of the CLC/CRC chain (the first tube stage) there is nothing left but DC, so to speak.

Ok, this is starting to look better. I can compensate for the drops by adding a few turns, and still get 35v out.

Incidentally, the whole reason behind this effort is to replace whatever is lost on the lower and upper guitar frequencies. I cannot give you scope outputs or values, but I know something is missing with the "status quo" amps, even the all-tube versions. We are compensating by adding all sorts of gadgets to reach the end, in addition to various methods of addition gain, and volume boosters. With this approach, even more noise and distortion is added, besides it being "artificial".

I am of the camp that even if you cannot define something on paper, or really see something on the scope, or even hear it with your ears, your brain does. This phenomenon is in the audio texbooks. It is briefly treated in the Handbook for Sound Engineers, as well as testimony in a few forums. I do not buy, "It doesn't matter since your signal is all distorted anyway." Agreed, most people cannot tell the difference between different pickups and amps (at least consciously), or whether the signals are processed through effects loops or not, but often the musician can, and that should not be discounted.

Back to the issue at hand, I realize that every change made to the sytem will affect the entire chain, and some experimentation is unavoidable. Since I have played before, I will rely on my subjectivity more than anything else. I certainly do not want to lose anything like "dynamics" as you say, so I will proceed with unregulated power amp supply. I need to check inrush with all this capacitance and deal with that, and tranny EMI shielding and interwinding capacitance shield which everyone agrees is good.
__________________
Venturing where the wise refuse to go, may or may not yield great revelations theretofore unknown; either with considerable expense.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 07:33 PM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by DF96 View Post
Sad to see a reputable company like Ohmite now producing 'audio grade' wirewounds. I guess business is business, though.
My intiution says the giant coil may act as an antenna. I did not know ceramic material could be "magnetic"' however.....or maybe it is the nichrome alloy or whatever they normally use. Also, out of that basic series is the "non-inductive" version as well.

Reduced inductance in this snubber was mentioned above.
__________________
Venturing where the wise refuse to go, may or may not yield great revelations theretofore unknown; either with considerable expense.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
unusual passive x-over question amp88 Parts 7 9th November 2010 01:43 PM
Baffle step Question for unusual enclosure REM Multi-Way 4 18th August 2007 08:31 PM
Regulating tube amp power supply - can Iget away with a simpler CLC filtering scheme? zobsky Tubes / Valves 0 12th October 2006 05:10 AM
AC Filtering question HIPCHECK Power Supplies 13 4th October 2006 05:02 PM
AC mains filtering question thylantyr Solid State 4 26th March 2003 09:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2