Power Supply Resevoir Size - Page 139 - diyAudio
 Power Supply Resevoir Size
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
 Originally Posted by danielwritesbac How to calculate transformer RMS AC Output Voltage and change it into common specs used with transformer purchases, such as their AC, Current, and VA figures? Same question more simply: Can the chart show real transformers?
I think that everything you listed is already given in the spreadsheet, except for VA. The AC RMS output voltage is given, as is the maximum RMS current for a given maximum output power. The transformer model is not ideal. So the values should be somewhat close to the real transformer you would need.

It seems like one of the most important things is to use a high-enough transformer output voltage. Find the output power you want, with a relatively-low minimum required capacitance, and use the corresponding transformer output voltage. Then use triple the Cmin, or more. You want the absolute-minimum C to be low, for the VAC RMS and Pmax combo that you choose, even though you'll probably use much more C than that. It just means that you have sufficient headroom and will have (or at least could have) low ripple amplitude.

But you also need some excess A (and VA) capability. I'm still working on trying to quantify that.

 8th October 2012, 07:09 AM #1382 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA IMO, the optimum transformer size is 2VA for every 1W you expect out of the amplifier into the minimum impedance you expect it to drive. This makes the assumption that you are not using stupidly large capacitors that give you a really bad power factor. An example might be a 100W x2 amplifier with a 400VA transformer. Yes, you can use a much smaller transformer. (but) The bigger the transformer is, the better it sounds. The point of rapidly diminishing return seems to be at 2VA for every 1W of output. YMMV __________________ Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author.
 8th October 2012, 07:14 AM #1383 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Netherlands What I normally do is use determine the voltage by the highest impedance that the amplifier needs to drive with the coresponding wattage and do the same for the current for the lowest impedance. The result is typically a bulky powersupply with lots of headroom. The result is also an amplifier that typically sounds well and has umpf. Looking at the famous amps, they all have plenty of power supply on board and they range in xformer from 1.5 to 4 times the power that the amp can deliver at 8 ohm's.
 8th October 2012, 08:14 PM #1384 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Indiana Blog Entries: 1 It makes a lot of sense to assume that the max RMS output power is actually double the max RMS sinusoidal output power, since a square wave WOULD literally double it, and we have seen music that approximates a square wave. So is that enough or should we then double that? I tend to want to say double it again. e.g. For "50 Watts RMS per channel" spec, assume 100 Watts per channel might be needed. Then 200 VA is really 1X and we want 2X so we would want 400 VA. It also kind of falls in line better with the plot in post 1359, at Power Supply Resevoir Size . http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...00va-500va.jpg Cheers, Tom Last edited by gootee; 8th October 2012 at 08:21 PM.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
 Originally Posted by gootee It makes a lot of sense to assume that the max RMS output power is actually double the max RMS sinusoidal output power, since a square wave WOULD literally double it, and we have seen music that approximates a square wave. So is that enough or should we then double that? I tend to want to say double it again. e.g. For "50 Watts RMS per channel" spec, assume 100 Watts per channel might be needed. Then 200 VA is really 1X and we want 2X so we would want 400 VA. It also kind of falls in line better with the plot in post 1359, at Power Supply Resevoir Size . http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...00va-500va.jpg Cheers, Tom
If a high-enough Vrms transformer output voltage is used, such that the absolute-minimum capacitance is "low" (maybe 5000 uF or less?), and 2X or 3X the absolute-minimum C (or more) is actually used, then there should be no reason to use much more VA than about 2X the maximum RMS sinusoidal output power spec. (But I might still want to add 20% to that.)

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Blog Entries: 1
If anyone is interested, here is the version of the spreadsheet that also calculates the average rail value and the ripple amplitude, for the cases with the absolute minimum C and 3X as much C.
Attached Files
 Linear_PSU_Calc_for_Audio_Amps_8_OHMS_with_ripple2.zip (42.4 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by gootee; 9th October 2012 at 12:20 AM.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
 Originally Posted by gootee If anyone is interested, here is the version of the spreadsheet that also calculates the average rail value and the ripple amplitude, for the cases with the absolute minimum C and 3X as much C.
Is it possible to list transformer VA on the spreadsheet?
__________________
DIY Models & AppsClipNipperLM1875TDA7293Powerful Parallel TDA7293 kit ♦ My post has opinion.

 9th October 2012, 11:11 AM #1388 diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Transformer VA cannot be derived from winding resistance alone. You would need to add a thermal calculation, together with knowledge of the exact behaviour of the insulation with temperature. That is why a 'x VA for y W' rule of thumb can never be more than an approximate rule of thumb, because it uses VA as a proxy for winding resistance but it is a weak proxy.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Blog Entries: 1

I decided that the spreadsheet needed to be changed, after noticing that while the calculated Cmin values agreed well with the values found during exhaustive simulations with LT-Spice, for cases where Cmin was less than about 4000uF-5000uF, the agreement deteriorated significantly for cases where the calculated Cmin was higher, with the spreadsheet predicting Cmin values that were significantly too low, compared to the worst-case square wave simulations.

The calculated values would probably be fine, most of the time, if only sine waves were considered, as is customary. But my intent was to try to provide Cmin values that would not allow the power supply to grossly distort the output, in any case at all. (But I suppose that in that case, the spreadsheet should just double the maximum RMS power entry. I might actually end up doing something similar to that.)

The new version that is attached should be consistent with the simulations whenever the calculated Cmin values are less than or equal to slightly less than 10000uF. Calculated Cmin values of 10000uF or higher should be considered to be at least 50% too low, which makes sense if they are for sinusoidal rather than square wave inputs. It also makes sense that the diference only becomes prominent when the Pmax is approaching the practical limit for each transformer output voltage.

Changes made, compared to previous version:

- Increased V_amp_min from 3.00 to 3.35 Volts, per reality.

- Changed "rectifier and rail drop" number, in calculation of Vc_pk, from 1.7 to 1.7+(0.35*1.414*iload_rms_max)

- Added column that calculates "Transformer Worst-Case Volt-Amps Per Rail", which just multiplies the peak output current by the peak output voltage. This would be doubled for a transformer that would power two stereo channels.

- Added columns for p-p ripple voltage and average rail voltage, for each of the two capacitances given

Cheers,

Tom
Attached Files
 Linear_PSU_Calc_for_Audio_Amps_8_OHMS_v2.zip (63.7 KB, 13 views)

 10th October 2012, 12:28 PM #1390 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2007 The affordable and low ripple selection is of most interest to me. Question: Is this applicable to a split rail amplifier, like 80W, 20,000u per rail, 28,0,28vac 4.3a transformer? Question2: For example, my 28,0,28vac 6a stereo build could support up to 70 watts per channel (140 watts)? Question3: If not applicable to a regular split rail amplifier driving an ordinary 8 ohm speaker, then how would the following need to be different? Code: ``` 0.5W 1,400u 4.1VA 1.0W 2,200u 5.4VA 1.3W 3,300u 6.3VA 2.5W 3,300u 11.9VA 3.1W 3,300u 13.2VA 9.1W 6,800u 28.6VA 15.0W 8,200u 44.7VA 25.0W 10,000u 71.3VA 30.0W 15,000u 77.9VA 32.0W 20,000u 80.4VA 39.2W 20,000u 97.5VA 55.0W 18,000u 135.7VA 65.0W 20,000u 158.5VA 98.0W 20,000u 234.9VA 100.0W 20,000u 237.3VA 125.0W 20,000u 295.7VA 155.0W 20,000u 363.2VA 180.0W 30,000u 395.4VA``` __________________ ♦ DIY Models & Apps ♦ ClipNipper ♦ LM1875 ♦ TDA7293 ♦ Powerful Parallel TDA7293 kit ♦ My post has opinion. Last edited by danielwritesbac; 10th October 2012 at 12:30 PM.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post SanderW Power Supplies 25 4th January 2013 05:12 PM Burnedfingers Tubes / Valves 25 5th January 2012 01:23 AM BigE Power Supplies 11 5th July 2011 03:59 PM diymixer Power Supplies 1 10th October 2010 06:47 AM spooney Car Audio 3 7th December 2007 12:50 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 PM.