Super Regulator, collecting the facts - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th September 2003, 07:56 PM   #11
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by jwb
Also three-terminal regulators tend to use noisier voltage references. In a superregulator you can use subsurface zeners or other high-quality refs.
...and you can use any LP-filter you like to filter out the noise.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
Super Regulator SSR03 Group buy
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2003, 08:33 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
johnferrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Quote:
Originally posted by jwb
Jung (and Sulzer, and other error-amp-with-pass-transistor designs) have extremely low output impedance and very wide bandwidth.
...
That's why my headphone amp, with idle current only a few hundred milliamps, uses four Sulzer-type regulators instead of the commercial parts.
JWB,

Thanks, that is information I wasn't aware of and the feedback I looked for. (Sorry Peranders, at least I'm not on the IP tangent...)

Are you happy with your Aleph headphone amp design? Do you recommend this topology? Right now, I'm interested in a differential design and am wondering about SuperSymmetry. The leading candidate today is a pair of crosscoupled OPA637/discrete output buffers. I don't mind going to the effort of making one headphone amplifier, but I don't plan to wish I had constructed something else. (Like everyone, I would like to make The best that I can.)

I will reconsider the SuperRegulator idea based on your feedback.


JF
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2003, 08:42 PM   #13
grataku is offline grataku  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
Going back to the subject matter I think the most refined Jung style SR at the moment is the ALW one. I am very intersted in the subject since I want to use it in my new, for personal use, preamp.
Unfortunately for reasons of PCB size and number of boards needed I need to design my own reg.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2003, 08:58 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London UK
Default Re: Linear Technologies LT1963

I've wondered about why people aren't using/talking about these.

(To be frank, my interest is to build a headphone amplifier so 1.5A is more than enough. For higher current capability, can't the LT1963 be used with a power FET?)

Comments anyone?
------------------------------------------------
I did , but no one was interested and went back to 20 yr old designs. I have been using these with good results.

Indeed the TI chips are good but they are spoilt by the need for a large ground plane to combat 50Hz noise. Why I don't know but all of that series is susceptable. They are also spoilt by the packaging not being a drop in replacement for 78xx. Neg regulators are also not extensive.

Perhaps more to the point is that 78xx and 79xx regs can be very good and much better than spec. Thre JRM ones especially so but one does need to select. The LT and LM series arev really not that good but look expensive!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2003, 09:23 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
johnferrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Default Re: Re: Linear Technologies LT1963

Quote:
Originally posted by fmak
I've wondered about why people aren't using/talking about these.

(To be frank, my interest is to build a headphone amplifier so 1.5A is more than enough. For higher current capability, can't the LT1963 be used with a power FET?)

Comments anyone?
------------------------------------------------
I did , but no one was interested and went back to 20 yr old designs. I have been using these with good results.

Indeed the TI chips are good but they are spoilt by the need for a large ground plane to combat 50Hz noise. Why I don't know but all of that series is susceptable. They are also spoilt by the packaging not being a drop in replacement for 78xx. Neg regulators are also not extensive.

Perhaps more to the point is that 78xx and 79xx regs can be very good and much better than spec. Thre JRM ones especially so but one does need to select. The LT and LM series arev really not that good but look expensive!
Combat 50hz noise:
LT1973--Low Noise: 40uVRMS (10Hz to 100kHz)

Neg regulator not extensive:
But positive regulators can be used as negative regulators, though with some degradation of performance.

The LT and LM series arev really not that good but look expensive!:
Though cheaper than discrete SuperRegulator circuitry.

If one wants a Jung-like SuperRegulator, take your favorite low noise, low PSRR, DC power amplifier circuit and bootstrap a reference voltage output to input. And use a pair of those to power the target amplifier circuitry. (Although I risk not making a lot of sense, I am trying to stay on topic.)


JF
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2003, 03:46 AM   #16
andy_c is offline andy_c  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Default Re: Jung Super Regulator, some facts

Quote:
Originally posted by peranders
(...)What happens when you have current limiting and the voltage is below min voltage for the opamp?
Well, I think this can be determined by looking at the schematic. I think you're asking what would happen If one added current limiting to the circuit and it was enabled due, say, to a short at the output? From what I can see, it would be the following. The feedback would try to drive the pass transistor to as high a current as possible due to the shorted output. Maximum base current to the pass transistor occurs when the PNP emitter follower connected to the op-amp output is in cutoff, allowing all of the PNP current source's current to be delivered to the base of the pass transistor. Since the PNP emitter follower's emitter current would be zero, there would be zero volts across the zener and its series resistor. This would put the emitter of the PNP emitter follower at about +0.7 Volts. But the op-amp might only be able to swing within about 2 Volts from its negative rail (ground). So the base of the PNP emitter follower would be sitting at about 2 Volts. Looks like you'd end up with a reverse biased base-emitter junction of the PNP emitter follower, but not enough to break it down. There would also be a significant voltage difference across the differential inputs of the op-amp in this state, but if you've read ALW's site, you'll see that the diodes he puts across the differential input will protect against that.

The startup process is described in detail at ALW's site.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2003, 05:57 AM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Plano , TX
Send a message via AIM to jewilson
Default S-J-D Regulators

There are regulators designs similar to the Jung-Sulzer-Didden around before their articles were published. If you have an old National Semiconductor application data books you will find regulators that look to be the foundation for this implementation.

While the implementation is different it may or may not be new for the time “it is still very well done” however I believe audio performance claims made in the articles for the circuit is new. The design offers great low noise performance and the ability to track dynamic changes in at the load with excellent stability. The keys are precision voltage reference, the high-speed transistor, the ultra low noise opamp, and the added ground sense implementation for audio.

My understanding is the only copyright protect belongs to the author work and what he is done in the development of the documentation for Audio Amateur-Audio Express magazine. They are no patents or trademarks other than the author name and no intellectual property issues.

To have intellectual property issues, as I understand it, this would have to have information i.e. a process, a method, or a design secret one has acquired at a company. Now, the person is at another company and if he implements the information gained at his previous employer that could be an intellectual issue. Therefore, the act of publishing the article for users, and users paying for the article seems to cancel out the intellectual property rights.

So using this circuit is ok for your home project. However, it would make good sense to alter and improve the design for commercial use.
__________________
Jim W.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2003, 07:37 AM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London UK
Default Re: Re: Re: Linear Technologies LT1963

[QUOTE]Originally posted by johnferrier
[B]

Combat 50hz noise:
LT1973--Low Noise: 40uVRMS (10Hz to 100kHz)

----------------------------------------------------------------
If you try them out ( and I have) you will find that only the grounded tab models are free from 50Hz pickup. All others require ground planes which make their use a hassle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2003, 07:49 AM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
johnferrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Linear Technologies LT1963

[QUOTE]Originally posted by fmak
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by johnferrier


Combat 50hz noise:
LT1973--Low Noise: 40uVRMS (10Hz to 100kHz)

----------------------------------------------------------------
If you try them out ( and I have) you will find that only the grounded tab models are free from 50Hz pickup. All others require ground planes which make their use a hassle.

I plan to give them a try. Here in the US, I'm sure that 50hz won't be a problem (obviously, 60hz might be a different story). Thanks for the info about the tab v no-tab.


JF
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2003, 10:04 AM   #20
diyAudio Retiree
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
Default Duly noted

Despite my feelings that a circuit development for 20 years and with input from the readers was "public domain," Jan does not. I have to respect his feelings since he put a lot work into the project. I am very pleased that he approves the results of ALW who has put a tremendous amount of work into his design, that look to me to be real improvements. The Jung regulator was not typical most hobbyist magazine projects in terms of input from others and length of development. I view the work by Mr. Pass in a much different manner. It is the product of his work alone, and commercial copies compete in marketplace were he earns his living. He has weighed in on the issue of the Aleph PCBs and I will let him speak on that matter. I live in mortal of misrepresenting his feelings to even the smallest degree. The fact is that the Jung regulator was based very heavily on the Sulzer article, which addressed the issues important in regulator design in a very concise and straight forward manner. I think the original Sulzer article was one of the best pieces ever published in TAA and is the Rosetta Stone for audio regulator circuits. I like to reread it from time to time to see the forest in addition to examining the bark of one particle tree with a magnifying glass. It is a great overview and is still very relevant after 20 something years.

The AD797 is not a very good op amp for the circuit due to possible stability issues when used with remote sensing. I also believe its phase margin is not as good as several other op amps often used for this circuit. Some of the jfet input op amps seem to work very well in this circuit. I would not even use remote sensing, but put the regulator very close to the circuit it is providing the regulation for. Unless you are careful you can wind up with stability issues and noise pick up when using remote sensing. Line rejection, good transient response, and linearity seem to be more sonically important than lowest absolute output impedance or noise. The noise level has as much to do with the voltage reference, filtering of the reference, and the PCB layout, as the input noise of the op amp.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2