CCS sharing warning - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th January 2012, 03:51 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Sch3mat1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Send a message via ICQ to Sch3mat1c Send a message via AIM to Sch3mat1c
Default CCS sharing warning

Working on my toobscoap, I have two long tailed pairs, supplied by MOSFET CCSs. Since the supply is regulated, I don't have any problem with using a voltage divider to set the gate voltage.

Testing with an X-Y pattern and scoping the deflection voltages, I noticed an odd artifact on the deflection plate voltages: when the horizontal sweep resets, there's a hump on the vertical waveform. It's common mode, so I don't see it anywhere on the CRT.

Poking in a bypass capacitor appropriately, it goes away.

So just a warning: 1. It doesn't really matter if the gate bias supply is bypassed, because common mode signals are well attenuated by full differential circuitry (like oscilloscopes and push-pull amplifiers). The only problem is it's inelegant, so 2. put in a teeny bypass cap just in case.

For visual, see attached. The bypass cap, of course, goes from "Vg" to ground, and 0.1uF is probably more than enough in any case. Many times, a regulated voltage is not available and a zener diode is used to fix this gate reference voltage; this works well, but a particularly fast downward transient will still couple through. A capacitor will also reduce HF noise from the zener.

I don't know how many people use common-reference CCSs. This is by no means an indictment against such usage, merely a warning to keep it clean. Reusing the reference will save supply current, zener diodes, heat and keep all your CCSs closer together over time and temperature drift.

Tim
Attached Images
File Type: png CCS_Cap.png (1.9 KB, 173 views)
__________________
Seven Transistor Labs
Projects and Resources
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2012, 03:56 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Wavebourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
"Greedy person pays twice" -- Russian saying. One more cheap resistor, and you are fine!
__________________
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2012, 12:02 PM   #3
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
D.Self run into a slightly different problem.
He linked the two CCSs feeding the LTP & VAS. He could not stop them interacting.
He finished and printed 2nd edition without a solution. 4th edition has the same error. I wonder if 5th edition is any better?

I see many copying the multiple CCSs from one voltage source. It looks wrong, now you are showing why it is wrong.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2012, 01:00 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Sch3mat1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Send a message via ICQ to Sch3mat1c Send a message via AIM to Sch3mat1c
Hardly wrong, I've demonstrated why it's fine -- MOSFETs couple capacitively; load it with more capacitance and it's fine.

BJTs are a slightly different story, though the trick can be used intentionally to save bias current in some cases. Take this circuit for instance:
Click the image to open in full size.

Not as much application in audio for this, except perhaps limiting / clipping protection circuitry.

Tim
__________________
Seven Transistor Labs
Projects and Resources
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2012, 09:30 AM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...ng-ccs_cap.png

I interpret the diagram you have posted as showing a reaction in the non changing channel (sink I2) when a change occurs in the operating channel (sink I1).
That surely is an example of what should not happen. To me you have demonstrated why it is wrong.

How does one repeat a pic from an earlier post?
__________________
regards Andrew T.

Last edited by AndrewT; 25th January 2012 at 09:32 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sharing a passive Xover Adrianb Multi-Way 17 26th May 2007 04:40 AM
sharing amplification chanvr6 Solid State 0 4th July 2004 11:09 AM
CCS Conceptual Qs, Using Gary Pimm CCS as Example DrDeville Tubes / Valves 20 12th May 2004 03:41 PM
Sharing DAC outputs Prune Digital Source 0 22nd January 2004 11:40 AM
Power sharing in 3-ways Andy G Multi-Way 3 29th November 2003 11:52 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2