|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Connecticut
|
Rather than try something complex using a Linear mode regulator, might I suggest a Switch mode boost regulator instead. A boost regulator would be more accomidating to the wide voltage range you're looking for and would require significantly fewer parts. The problem with a linear circuit is the excess power losses, as the regulating transistor must drop the voltage from about 200V (your highest voltage output) to 50V your lowest value, a 150V difference.
One suggestion is to take a look at the LM3478 switching regulator configured in a Buck boost mode. In addition to easier implementation and fewer parts, you can use a low voltage input (perhaps 24V) that so that you don't expose yourself to dangerous voltage levels on the input side, while your testing your design. ![]() http://www.national.com/images/pf/LM3478/10135501.pdf |
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
making a switching regulator work properly, from 0 to Inominal with a wide range of output voltage is not exactly trivial. And I count 13 parts for this circuit, against 10 for the basic linear version. Plus, I personally hate switching supplies for test gear: if you want to eliminate up to the last µV of differential and common mode noise, you have to go to extraordinary lengths of filtering, shielding, etc. And I don't like the relatively large output capacitors either: they have a good potential of destruction when something goes wrong. But of course, all that is a matter of personal taste...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Many thanks you guys for all your suggestions!
And, TechGuy, I have to admit that Elvee has a point here in his last post. Joe. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Elvee, I tried to run your file after downloading it and get a comment
'Can't find definition of model "BF469". Because I am rather a newbee using LTspice: where can I find this model and how can I implement this in the circuit diagram? I see in the bottom left side of the diagram '.tran 0 60m 10m 1u'. Has that something to do with this problem? Sorry for the trouble. Joe. |
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
Note that the supply voltage and load current have heavy 100Hz and 1KHz ripple, it is intended to test the performances, but you can turn them off if you just want to examine the static operation.
__________________
|
||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Regulated power supply | akunec | Chip Amps | 3 | 5th November 2006 10:27 AM |
| regulated power supply | adason | Swap Meet | 1 | 11th December 2005 06:32 PM |
| Looking for 200v-0-200v power tranny | eVITAERC | Parts | 0 | 3rd November 2005 05:30 AM |
| Regulated power supply | crissty | Chip Amps | 23 | 2nd September 2005 04:18 AM |
| FS: SMPS 50-0-50 regulated DC | Bent | Swap Meet | 7 | 25th August 2005 08:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |