|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
|
hi all
I have been reading stuff of this site and it has confused me a bit. I have built a few power supplies in the past and always taken the rectified DC from my rectifiers to the filter caps ... In the image attached the chap takes the rectified DC and places it after the filter caps. I've attached an URL to his site also. thanks for the help. High End Audio - Preamplifier model 4 |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
If you flip it around it looks different again, but still is electrically the same. jan didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
|
Hi
On his site he goes on to say the connection point DOES make a difference. He goes on to say that the noise levels are lower if you enter after the filter caps as in the picture and this is to do with the heavy charging currents. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
It looks like a CLC filter.
The L taps in after the first C. I doubt that tapping a supply direct to the L output rather than the second C output will improve the quality of the DC.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
|
thanks Andrew
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]() I can't really grasp his logic on the PSU... Trying to imagine what he's thinking. It's not like an amplifier output where the output (and feedback takeoff) should be run off a small spur. That is done to avoid the problem of small but not negligable resistances of print/solder/wire etc. Hazy thinking without sitting down and drawing it out suggests that three 100uf caps esentially "share" the total ripple current. So the current in each "wire" to each cap has 1/3rd of the total ripple current. But each cap still "sees" the total combined ripple voltage that is on the main connection back to the rectifiers... If you assume the conductors/wire/print have perfect zero ohm properties then it does not matter where the connection is made. If you accept they have small values of resistance then I thing the difference in e.s.r. of the caps would become dominant in the distribution of charging currents but would there be a point in all the connections/wiring that a constant current load would "see" a slightly (and it would be microscopic) lower level of disturbance... I not so sure. Over to somebody else All I would say is that careful and correct wiring is really the big big thing to get right in any design. You have to treat each each conductor as a resistance and make sure that whatever develops across it can not alter the signal in any way.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
He should attach the incoming DC + and - from the rectifier etc to the left-hand end of the caps, and take a clean outgoing DC (and ground) from the right-hand end of the caps. So the only thing he has got right there is the position of the ground at the output. Unfortunately he then spoils it by injecting charging pulses into it!
I can't be bothered to read his site, but if this diagram is typical then I suspect that he doesn't really know what he is doing. All that bypassing is a little silly, especially with such a poor wiring/grounding arrangement. As Elvee says, a mains transformer will make a rather poor choke - maybe it is an attempt at a swinging choke? "High end" Really? |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mar del Plata, a BIG seasonal getaway city, can see the Ocean from our residence.
|
These guys.....Although they don't buy in to the zillion dollar cabling scam , they do seem obsessed with the whole "Vibration suppression is paramount to good sound"......camp.
Sighing & shaking head. __________________________________________________ _____Rick............. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tube rectified psu | misterno | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 23rd October 2010 06:07 PM |
| Confusion about Rectified voltage... | Skorpio | Tubelab | 1 | 20th May 2010 12:32 PM |
| learning tube rectified psu | milen007 | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 21st September 2008 12:28 PM |
| Rectified question | kyrochan | Solid State | 5 | 6th April 2005 06:43 PM |
| Rectified heater voltage problems? | eeka chu | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 9th January 2004 04:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13000 seconds (83.00% PHP - 17.00% MySQL) with 11 queries |