|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A little more info, please, on what you are trying to achieve here. Does it have a problem right now or are you looking to just buff something up?
![]() If you are asking about a high frequency bypass capacitor across filter electrolytic(s) then that is typically a 0.1uF ceramic across C803, C804, or both. If there is room/clearance on the bottom of the PC board you could solder the 0.1uF's directly across the electrolytic pins there. C803, R801, and C804 are forming a CRC filter going into the regulator. Something like these: http://search.digikey.com/scripts/Dk...=478-3146-1-ND (Digikey) KEMET|C330C104K1R5TA|CAPACITOR CERAMIC 0.1UF 100V X7R | Farnell United Kingdom (Farnell) This type of bypass solves the problem of the electrolytic having a large(r) series inductance which increases impedance at higher frequencies. The ceramic has a low inductance. There is no polarity on ceramics, of course (no + lead). You can solder it in either way across the electrolytic pins. Last edited by agdr; 17th September 2011 at 08:27 PM. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sounds good! I just added a Farnell number too. Just a standard disk ceramic 0.1uF rated 100V or above would work just fine also.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The best place for a bypass, if you feel one is necessary, is the amp board not the PSU board.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
I think I would go with a 0.47 uF metalized polypropylene cap. You have a voltage regulator so it may help more after the regulator than before, or do both. You could also upgrade the two main caps by increasing them 50% in size and looking for a low impedance design. The Panasonic FM or FR would do for a 680 uF and 50 volts. A Chemicon KZE would do in the 63 V location.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| power supply bypass cap size | BigE | Power Supplies | 11 | 5th July 2011 02:59 PM |
| Polar electro with bypass cap to replace nonpolar as coupling cap? | at77 | Parts | 0 | 12th January 2010 02:05 AM |
| Bypass caps on power supply | digital desire | Solid State | 55 | 18th January 2007 04:15 PM |
| Want to bypass power supply, but... | beanbag | Chip Amps | 1 | 17th November 2005 04:47 PM |
| Power Supply Bypass Caps | dsrviola | Solid State | 1 | 3rd November 2002 07:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10092 seconds (76.65% PHP - 23.35% MySQL) with 10 queries |