|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Hey.
I have a question about how to choose the VA rating of a transformer, for a given power amplifier, and i am hoping that some of you would be kind enough to help me I am pretty sure i already know the answer to this, but i am a bit confused, and i just want to check if i really am right. Let's assume i have build an amplifier that runs on +/- 35V supply rails and puts out +/- 24,7V RMS, to the connected load. In this case, a 4R speaker is connected as load, and for simplicity, let's say this speaker is purely resistive (it is not, i know). At max. output this would result in the speaker drawing: 24,7V/4R = ~6,2A RMS, or 24,7V * 6,2A = ~150W, from each of the power supply rails, through the amplifier of course. Therefore, if i want to run the amp at full power continously, i would need to use a transformer with a VA-rating of at least 300VA (150VA each secondary winding), right? Since i didn't take any losses into consideration, this VA-rating would, of course, have to be higher in a real world application, but this is just to be sure i got it right. Please correct me if im wrong. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
um did you account for the %50 efficiency or what ever is for your amp? If its class ab chip amp its going to need 300 watts per channel.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
The power draw is 50% + and 50 % - meaning that each rail only sees load 50 % of the time making the per rail load half what was calculated. Then there is amplifier efficiency, but if you work in current rather than voltage and add 100 mA or so for bias then the result will be close. For a sine wave into a 4 ohm resistive load with 10% power supply sag at full load and 4V drop in the output devices at the onset of clipping 25*1.414*.9 = 31.8V under load - 4V = 27.8V peak/ 1.414 = 19.7V RMS /4ohm = 4.9 A RMS + 100 mA bias - 5 A * 35V unloaded supply voltage = 175W. The unloaded DC rail voltage is used in the power calculation because that is the voltage before losses. Also I only calculated assuming one supply rail because the load is a 50/50 on each rail so effectively 100% one one rail This approach is simplistic but close enough for most use. If this is an application with 100% duty then transformer utilisation factor needs to be factored in, for a single phase capacitor input filter with bridge rectifier it is somewhere between 1.5 and 1.8 depending on the transformer leakage inductance and the filter capacitor size 300VA would do this easy. FWIW music is unlikely to present a 100% duty 175W load to the power supply. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
Forgot a few things like the voltage drop in the bridge rectifier (roughly 0.8V per rail) and the wattage shouldn't be calculated on the unloaded voltage, rather the loaded voltage because the transformer is rated for it's loaded voltage or it should be
Also a 25V 0 25V transformer might produce 35V loaded because the maker has accounted for the sag under load and raised the no load voltage accordingly Hope that makes sense. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Have a look at this,
The Signal Transfer Company: Power Output
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
The example the link is not representative of a typical audio amplifier, to achieve saturation the base of the output transistor needs to be driven above the output supply rail voltage which is achievable with boosted driver voltage but that is not what the OP plans on doing. The other reason to keep the output stages out of saturation is that the gain falls off rapidly near saturation.
Sketch the VAS and driver stages of a typical amplifier with all the relevant voltage drops included and you will see what I mean. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transformer VA rating | Buzzy | Parts | 11 | 26th June 2008 09:13 AM |
| Transformer VA rating?? | RyanW | Power Supplies | 6 | 11th November 2006 10:23 PM |
| Transformer Va choosing? | pikkujöpö | Power Supplies | 7 | 25th April 2006 07:39 AM |
| Transformer VA Rating vs. Current Rating | JhonDoe | Chip Amps | 45 | 5th June 2004 01:11 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09274 seconds (83.43% PHP - 16.57% MySQL) with 10 queries |