
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Wiki  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
16th April 2011, 10:15 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008

Why is it not a Constant Current Source ?
My primary intention was to build a 2 amp switch mode Constant Current Source with low power dissipation.
I first tried a selfoscillating approach as published here: Switching current source for Class A? The way it works is basically that  the current is sensed by means of the 1 ohm resistor  translated into a voltage by the differential amplifier  compared to a reference voltage  the mosfet turns on when below the reference  and turns off when above the reference. This is the diagram on the left side. (Note: I am using 1 Ohm and 10 kOhm resistors just for demonstration purposes. Other values may be more efficient.) It worked well. Despite varying the load resistor between 1 Ohm and 10 Ohms, the current stays fairly constant at 2 amps. The effective impedance of the CCS was measured to be around 2 kOhm. Next I wanted to simplify the design, eliminating the differential amplifier by moving the 1 ohm sense resistor to the bottom i.e. into the source of the mosfet. This is the diagram on the right side. (Note: it resembles the classic analog 2transistor CCS except for it is selfoscillating). My thinking was, that when I controlled the peak current through the inductor to be 2 amps, corresponding to a drop of 2 volts on the 1 ohm sense resistor, this would also control the current through the load. I was wrong ! When I vary the load resistor between 1 Ohm and 10 Ohms, the current varies also: 1.0 ohm load > 25 volts / 5 amps 2.5 ohms load > 20 volts / 4 amps 5.0 ohms load > 15 volts / 3 amps It seems that I built a switched mode Constant Resistor of 5 ohms, albeit with a power dissipation of just 1/10 that of a conventional resistor !!!  Nice ... maybe this could be useful elsewhere ...  But why is it not a CCS ?  Why is the current through the load higher than 2 amps although the comparator should turn off whenever the current through the sense resistor reaches 2 amps  thereby limiting the peak current in the inductor and hence the load ? My first suspect was the delay caused by the R/C filter, but modifying the filter doesn't change anything  except the frequency of the oscillation. 
17th April 2011, 08:21 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006

There is no hysteresis in your systems, which means there will be a fast oscillation around the average value of the set current
In the first case, your current sense resistor senses both the charge and discharge current in the inductor, and the average is correct. In the second case, it doesnt take into account the charge current during the ON time of the switch. Note that even with a proper hysteresis, I find this control strategy rather poor: it only works because there is a fixed ratio between the peak and average current. The regulator should regulate the average current directly (perhaps driving an inner loop based on a current mode switch). 
17th April 2011, 10:45 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008

Thanks for your reply.
I actually had a 1 meg positive feedback across the comparator, forgot to put it into the drawing. Doesn't help the control problem though, just lowers the oscillation frequency. I was aware of it not measuring the "discharge" current when the switch is off. Had hoped that controlling the "charge" current would also control the "discharge" to some extent. After all the relatively large inductor should keep the same current flowing through the diode and hence the load when the switch is off. Or at least almost the same  since the frequency is high around 500 kHz. So it works in the left circuit. What I didn't expect at all is the constant R effect of the other circuit and for which I have no explanation so far at all.
__________________
Judge: This court appreciates that you invented physics, Mr.Newton, but unfortunately you can't have a patent on it. 
17th April 2011, 10:59 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia

Yes, the curent will flow, but via a different path and the comparator doesn't "see" it. So... you are breaking the control loop.

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Constant current source, am I missing anything...  gmphadte  Power Supplies  4  3rd August 2007 05:07 AM 
constant current source  hacknet  Solid State  19  13th March 2006 03:46 PM 
3 constant current source questions  Jef Patat  Solid State  12  18th January 2005 03:30 PM 
constant current source question  Randy Knutson  Parts  0  31st March 2003 02:42 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 