Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th March 2011, 12:09 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Default Let's talk gate drive rise time and noise

Many of the app notes relating to gate drives are mentioning rise times of 50 to 100nS. I can achieve close to this with a totem pole bipolar drive but the fast RT generates excessive noise on the output of my half bridge SMPS.

For example, at 110nS RT and 80nS FT, the noise on my +6Vdc output before the linear regulator is about 600mVpp. This is not ripple, it's spurious noise. If I slow down the RT, the noise is reduced. At RT=500nS, it's down to 240mVpp.

At the 110nS RT, there's no ringing, the gate waveform is very clean and of course it's even cleaner with the 500nS RT. There's no shoot through, leakage inductance of the transformer is 4nH (hand wound), operating flux is 200mT using an ETD39 3F3 core.

What RTs and noise are other people measuring? I'd like to target 100nS RT and keep the MOSFETs running cooler but how to minimize the noise on the transformer output?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 12:54 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
opps, make that 4uH leakage inductance
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 01:09 AM   #3
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
I think noise or EMI relates more directly to parasitics esp XFMR inductive leakage, and PCB layouts, component parasitics, rather than rise/fall times which tend to excite said resonances both by the primary switches and secondary (rectifiers) switches. The more parasitics the slower operating frequencies, longer dead times and tr,tf to realize lowest EMI designs. It's better to fix the parasitics best you can 1st rather to slow things down. Sorry this is only a philosophy and doesn't help your specific design. perhaps more snubbers?
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 03:53 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Thanks for responding.

The highest amplitude switching noise on the secondary is centered around 10Mhz. The secondary rectifiers are snubbed. The ringing freq is 40Mhz, amplitude is <500mVpp.

The primary switches, exposed to a voltage of 330Vpp, are relatively clean, < 1Vpp ringing amplitude at about 4Mhz.

Of course the layout isn't perfect but I'd expect to be able to find the source of the noise by probing around. Still looking
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rise-time question JoshK Tubes / Valves 3 13th February 2009 01:35 PM
Gate Drive Transformer microsim444 Everything Else 1 2nd December 2008 12:52 PM
Tube rise time and slew rate gain-wire Tubes / Valves 11 26th October 2007 02:11 AM
Noise floor rise on heathkit W4-AMs when power supply transformers were swapped terminatorx Tubes / Valves 4 8th October 2006 01:31 AM
OpAmp specs: slew rat vs. rise/fall time rtarbell Parts 2 6th December 2005 04:38 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Page generated in 0.07950 seconds (72.93% PHP - 27.07% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio