I'm assuming that since the max voltage output of the LM317 is 37V that the 68V is actually + to - ie +34V 0V -34V.
In this case there is only about 6V of headroom per device. My (simulation) experience is that if you go for less than 5V differential in to out, that the ripple increases quite substantially.
I searched for alternatives to the LM317, some people were extolling the virtues of the LT1085 at the time I was looking, but I ended up deciding to stay with the LM317, actually an LT317A which is a closer tolerance version of the original LM317.
If one has burned, you might want to consider upping the heat sinking!
Tony.
In this case there is only about 6V of headroom per device. My (simulation) experience is that if you go for less than 5V differential in to out, that the ripple increases quite substantially.
I searched for alternatives to the LM317, some people were extolling the virtues of the LT1085 at the time I was looking, but I ended up deciding to stay with the LM317, actually an LT317A which is a closer tolerance version of the original LM317.
If one has burned, you might want to consider upping the heat sinking!
Tony.
I am repairing a factory amp therefore regret that there is no room for using dual regulators.
The input voltage is +80V - 0 - -80V, so the output is +68V - 0 - -68V. These regulators are for the driver board only. As of "better", I really don't know what would make an amp better in its performance? The amp is pretty quiet as original but you know people never get satisfied!
I burnt the 337 because of my own fault, nothing to do with the amp's design. The amp is scratching therefore I tried to "observe" which could be the problem. I saw a cap looks like swelling therefore I de-soldered it from the board and measured but nothing wrong with it. When I put it back to the board, I wrongly placed the polarity therefore the cap blasted and the 337 is dead. Luckily, the amp returns to working condition when I replaced the 337 and the cap but the scratches are still there.
The input voltage is +80V - 0 - -80V, so the output is +68V - 0 - -68V. These regulators are for the driver board only. As of "better", I really don't know what would make an amp better in its performance? The amp is pretty quiet as original but you know people never get satisfied!
I burnt the 337 because of my own fault, nothing to do with the amp's design. The amp is scratching therefore I tried to "observe" which could be the problem. I saw a cap looks like swelling therefore I de-soldered it from the board and measured but nothing wrong with it. When I put it back to the board, I wrongly placed the polarity therefore the cap blasted and the 337 is dead. Luckily, the amp returns to working condition when I replaced the 337 and the cap but the scratches are still there.
Since these are floating regs, there's no maximum output voltage as such, just a max input-output voltage. Its risky though running them at such high voltages as under short-circuit conditions they can easily exceed the 37V in-out differential and need some protection.
And being LT I'm guessing at least 20dB more expensive?
Thanks abrax, I was taking the 37V as being an absolute (ie max 40V input - 3V dropout = 37V). I never thought of it as being relative to the input voltage and the adjustment just being how much you drop that voltage by (though I guess since I'm using a positive reg in the -ve rail of my circuit I should have!)
Yes the LT's are more expensive but 6db would be a closer approximation but at an extra $6 in total for two I'm not going to quibble too much
Tony.
Yes the LT's are more expensive but 6db would be a closer approximation
but at an extra $6 in total for two I'm not going to quibble too much Tony.
Yes the LT's are more expensive but 6db would be a closer approximation
$6 over here would get me half a gross of LM317
Are these scratches worse when you move the volume (or other) pot(s)? you may have a noisy pot. Some contact cleaning spray squirted into the pots may help.
Tony.
PS. Abrax, I know stuff is cheap in China but that is ridiculous
I've often been tempted to order some stuff from Farnel China (yes I know they aren't cheap but compared to the Australian pricing they are!), get it delivered to one of my wife's relatives and ask them to ship it to me... just not sure they would accept a foreign credit card...
Last edited:
Never ever use contact spray on potentiometers and/or switches. The whole device will be greasy, dirty and the problem will return. There is only one good solution and that is thorough inside cleaning of the potentiometer or switch if it is not worn out. Replacement will be less time consuming if the parts can be bought at all.
Contact spray should not be on workbenches of good tech people. It is in the category of using aluminium foil for replacing blown fuses, or like using brake cleaner to start an engine etc. It is the last inadequate solution to a problem that will end the life of that part faster.
Sunsun22, when turning potentiometers (if a 431 has those) does not change the scratching my guess is that you have a leaky transistor or SMD ceramic/electrolytic cap.
Contact spray should not be on workbenches of good tech people. It is in the category of using aluminium foil for replacing blown fuses, or like using brake cleaner to start an engine etc. It is the last inadequate solution to a problem that will end the life of that part faster.
Sunsun22, when turning potentiometers (if a 431 has those) does not change the scratching my guess is that you have a leaky transistor or SMD ceramic/electrolytic cap.
Last edited:
There are a number of trimmers on the circuit board but I don't know what would happen if I turn them because I don't have the circuit or repair manual. I measured the DC offset from the output (with a pair of cheap speaker connected) and there is only 0.001V DC.
What I would like to do as follows: -
1. There are not too many electrolytic caps on the board, I'll replace them all. These caps are Panasonic NHG and is available in Mouser.
2. I'll go through all solder joints again.
3. I'll de-solder all trimmers, measure their current resistance and replace them with the same model number. Yet, I wonder if I can get the correct measurement from the de-soldered trimmer because the heat may change the resistance? A damaged trimmer may not give the correct measurement? The replacement trimmer; although from the same model number, may have slight difference among batches of productions. Can someone give me their opinions on this?
If the scratching does not go away, then it could be a transistor leaky. How to find out which transistor is leaky on the circuit board?
Is there any resources to obtain ML431's circuit?
Thanks
What I would like to do as follows: -
1. There are not too many electrolytic caps on the board, I'll replace them all. These caps are Panasonic NHG and is available in Mouser.
2. I'll go through all solder joints again.
3. I'll de-solder all trimmers, measure their current resistance and replace them with the same model number. Yet, I wonder if I can get the correct measurement from the de-soldered trimmer because the heat may change the resistance? A damaged trimmer may not give the correct measurement? The replacement trimmer; although from the same model number, may have slight difference among batches of productions. Can someone give me their opinions on this?
If the scratching does not go away, then it could be a transistor leaky. How to find out which transistor is leaky on the circuit board?
Is there any resources to obtain ML431's circuit?
Thanks
Last edited:
Hi SunSun, I was thinking more of volume controls or any tone controls directly in the signal path. I wouldn't suggest touching the trim pots if you don't know what it is they adjust! Probably best if you start a new thread in the Solid State forum to ask for some troubleshooting help. Perhaps if you can record the scratchy sound and attach so people can hear the symptom it might help too
Just for refernce this is the contact cleaning spray that I use http://www.crcind.com.au/catalogue.nsf/%28TDS%29/TDS%202015,2016/$FILE/TDS.pdf Jean-Claude may not like this either I don't know, but I've had no problems with it. As far as I can tell it washes the dirt away and 100% evapourates leaving no residue.
Tony.
Just for refernce this is the contact cleaning spray that I use http://www.crcind.com.au/catalogue.nsf/%28TDS%29/TDS%202015,2016/$FILE/TDS.pdf Jean-Claude may not like this either I don't know, but I've had no problems with it. As far as I can tell it washes the dirt away and 100% evapourates leaving no residue.
Tony.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.