|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
The 10uF caps are after the big 6800uF filter caps but before the regulators, so maybe they are part of some bypass for the big filter caps.
The design is mur860's into 6800uF the into 10uF caps and the into 7815 and 7915, then out to 10uF, the to 47uF then to op-amp power rails. (btw this is on Behringer Truth B2031 powered monitors,with LM3886 amps) out, Robert |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
Maybe so, but a board full of TTL with a 2 MHz clock and 10 ns rise times is not something I would hang off a slow regulator with no decoupling. The other advantage is the decoupling acts as a low pass filter reducing regulator noise.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
I wouldn't base a design on spec. sheets that differ in age by maybe 30 years. Test methods change with time. Chip manufacturing processes change with time.
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
Yes, I think that you are putting too much faith in spec. sheets. Manufacturing techniques change with time, mfg. seldom update the spec. sheets.
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
I get what you are saying.
The newer parts are probably an improvement, but the sheets do not reflect this fact. out, Robert |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
|
Quote:
These were downloaded directly from the manufacturers and not at third party, though... |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Jitter,
it looks like you are correct, I found new spec sheets at On-Semi. The newer 78XX and 79XX have different specs (and generally better) than some older spec sheets I found on the internet. The newer 7915 form On-Semi has better specs than the older ones. I guess the question I still have is the On-Semi NCP7815TG with 6.8uV/VO output noise voltage and 70db of ripple rejection better than the old LM7815A I have in there? The LM7815A is over 10 years old, the newer spec sheet I found on the LM7815A has a better noise spec of 90uV. but I do not know if this is the total noise or if it is measured in uV/VO. Thank You, Robert |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
|
The units tell you if it's total noise or noise per volt output.
total noise = uV noise per volt output = uV/VO. If the manufacturer used the units correctly, that means that 90 uV is total noise. A bit of mathematics shows this is most likely true: 6.8 uV/VO * 15 VO = 102 uV (total noise for the NCP7815TG) 90 uV/15 VO = 6 uV/VO (noise per volt output for the LM7815A) Last edited by jitter; 18th December 2010 at 06:59 AM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 7815/7915 dual supply hum problem | Lenn Art | Power Supplies | 8 | 22nd March 2011 09:57 PM |
| Pin compatible 7815/7915 replacements? | Isaac Sibson | Parts | 9 | 26th October 2010 04:05 PM |
| 7805 with adjR vs 7815 | wleediy | Power Supplies | 0 | 30th March 2008 11:18 PM |
| 7815 | lopan | Parts | 4 | 14th November 2004 02:19 AM |
| 7815 not regulating. | JoeBob | Solid State | 16 | 8th September 2003 12:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11128 seconds (80.81% PHP - 19.19% MySQL) with 10 queries |