|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Östergötland
|
Hi,
In a PSU (for a tube amp, with a choke, cap, choke, cap config) What would be the result if I substitute say a 100uF cap with ten 10uF caps in parallell, or two 200uF caps in series. Simple math tells you that the total uF will be the same but I do not have the skills to know what will actually happend. Are there any pros/cons of building a PSU with a single cap of the correct uF instead of a couple of caps giving the same total uF for the cap in question. Regards, Fredrik |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dundee
|
Quote:
Rod Elliot of ESP recommends using multiple paralleled capacitors rather than 1 large value item. His comments can be seen here; Project 101 - High Power, High Fidelity MOSFET power amplifier Go down the page to Fig. 3 and read the comments below it. Basically, you can expect better performance and lower cost but offset against this will be greater complexity of build. I can't see any benefit from using higher voltage rated items in series but if you have lots to hand, why not? Sandy |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
|
It's not as simple as just paralleling them.
The caps can only be placed a minimum of their diameter and a bit apart unless you mount them on both sides of a pcb. You have to connect the parallel caps with something, either pcb traces or wires. Sooner or later the pcb trace/wire inductance and resistance outweighs the gains in reduced inductance and ESR won by paralleling the caps in the first place. If, for example, I wanted a 10,000uF cap, I'd limit it to 4 or 6 x 2,200 uF mounted on both sides of a pcb. Always use higher voltage rated caps - they have lower ESR to start with. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
|
It's not as simple as just paralleling them.
The caps can only be placed a minimum of their diameter and a bit apart unless you mount them on both sides of a pcb. You have to connect the parallel caps with something, either pcb traces or wires. Sooner or later the pcb trace/wire inductance and resistance outweighs the gains in reduced inductance and ESR won by paralleling the caps in the firstplace. If, for example, I wanted a 10,000uF cap, I'd limit it to 4 or 6 x 2,200 uF mounted on both sides of a pcb. Always use higher voltage rated caps - they have lower ESR ro start with. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| One Dozen Wima MKP4 10uF 250V caps | stellavox | Swap Meet | 0 | 21st May 2010 11:41 AM |
| 100uF Motor Run Caps | i45one | Tubes / Valves | 34 | 15th November 2009 06:15 PM |
| Wanted: 10uf mpk caps | audiodan | Swap Meet | 0 | 5th March 2009 11:58 PM |
| FS - (4) 100uf Axon Caps | Guiness | Swap Meet | 1 | 30th May 2008 05:35 PM |
| e-caps configuration for 10uF in aleph p | ackcheng | Pass Labs | 1 | 24th January 2006 04:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07681 seconds (74.12% PHP - 25.88% MySQL) with 10 queries |