Compare IGBT-losses and MOSFET-losses
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 2nd September 2010, 08:49 AM #1 kall   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2010 Compare IGBT-losses and MOSFET-losses When it comes to calculate switching losses for IGBT it is fairly simple because manufacturers give you Eon and Eoff of the switch.. ex. Pon= Eon * U/Uref * I/Iref *fsw This is not given for MOSFETs, how can u calculate the mosfet-losses in a way to have a good comparison against IGBTs
 3rd September 2010, 02:06 AM #2 star882   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Mar 2007 In general, MOSFETs are better at low voltages and high frequencies while IGBTs are better at high voltages and low frequencies. __________________ "Fully on MOSFET = closed switch, Fully off MOSFET = open switch, Half on MOSFET = poor imitation of Tiffany Yep." - also applies to IGBTs!
 5th September 2010, 05:13 PM #3 kall   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2010 yes, thats true...but i need to make some calculations on this aswell... so... how do u calculate accurate mosfet-losses (cond- switching-losses) with the data that is usually given in the datasheets for mosfets...
 5th September 2010, 09:17 PM #4 star882   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Mar 2007 RDSon is the resistance of the MOSFET when it's on. Calculate that power loss exactly as for a resistor (P=I^2 * R). Dynamic losses are harder to calculate and will depend on the circuit. You'll want to drive the gate with a low impedance to minimize the amount of time the MOSFET or IGBT spends in the half-on "Tiffany Yep" mode, but not low enough to cause destructive ringing. Driving the gate negative to turn it off can help accelerate switching by counteracting stray capacitance. __________________ "Fully on MOSFET = closed switch, Fully off MOSFET = open switch, Half on MOSFET = poor imitation of Tiffany Yep." - also applies to IGBTs!
 6th September 2010, 04:33 AM #5 Sch3mat1c   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Milwaukee, WI Oh, and if you'll be using MOSFETs anywhere near rated power, calculate junction temperature and find the resulting change in Rds(on). Transistors over 60V have a strong positive tempco (typically double at ~125C). This results in twice the power dissipation compared to the 25C figure, not something you want to forget. Notably, transistors under 30V have a very low tempco (~1.2x at 125C), so if you're building a very low voltage power supply, it's worthwhile to get 20 or 25V transistors instead of 30 or 60V types. Negative gate drive is useful for devices with stored charge, like IGBTs. Whereas MOSFETs turn off essentially as soon as the gate falls, IGBTs take tens of ns to turn off. After the delay, Vce can rise again, inducing miller charge into the gate, making it "chatter". Reverse bias keeps the gate further from Vge(th), preventing miller turn-on. Tim __________________ Seven Transistor Labs, LLC Projects and Resources / Electronic Design and Consultation
 6th September 2010, 01:19 PM #6 sawreyrw   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Minnesota Tim, You are confused about IGBT and MOSFET gate charge (input capacitance). Both devices have Ciss, Crss and, of course, exhibit the Miller effect. It takes current and time to charge and discharge the gates. Generally speaking IGBTs will have larger capacitances, because they are large devices. Rick
 6th September 2010, 04:31 PM #7 darkfenriz   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warsaw A first approximation is: 1/2*ton*fsw*U*I, same for switching off. Switching times are more dependant on gate drive, compared to IGBT which have some internal slowdown mechanisms like current tail.
kall
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
 Originally Posted by darkfenriz A first approximation is: 1/2*ton*fsw*U*I, same for switching off. Switching times are more dependant on gate drive, compared to IGBT which have some internal slowdown mechanisms like current tail.
is this really a good approx?, i found this very simple...

-------------

i have a case with 100kHz 20V 210A (i guess MOSFETs are the only option here?)

any rule of thumb what "size" to choose to have a good "safety margin", go up to 40V, 60V??

Sch3mat1c
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Quote:
 Originally Posted by sawreyrw Tim, You are confused about IGBT and MOSFET gate charge (input capacitance). Both devices have Ciss, Crss and, of course, exhibit the Miller effect. It takes current and time to charge and discharge the gates. Generally speaking IGBTs will have larger capacitances, because they are large devices.
Ah, you're confused about my meaning of charge-- gate charge is easy to deal with because you can suck it away with the gate driver. "Stored charge" is a junction effect, and the cause of "storage time" in BJTs. As a hybrid, IGBTs have both effects. Stored charge means you can't turn it off arbitrarily fast, even if you force the gate off in just a few nanoseconds. The MOSFET part turns off in that time, but the BJT part continues to conduct for a few hundred ns (depending).

Incidentially, IGBTs of the same ratings as MOSFETs have lower gate charge, because the junction is smaller (higher current density). Another advantage to IGBTs!

Tim
__________________
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Projects and Resources / Electronic Design and Consultation

 7th September 2010, 08:53 PM #10 sawreyrw   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Minnesota Tim, The BJT in the IGBT does not saturate, because the collector base junction is never forward biased. Thus the traditional BJT storage time is near zero. Rick

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post dead rat Class D 0 16th December 2008 03:33 PM bmansz Multi-Way 7 1st November 2008 01:18 AM ThSpeakerDude88 Instruments and Amps 5 28th January 2008 02:50 PM destroyer X Solid State 12 5th June 2007 03:49 PM REALFLEO Multi-Way 2 7th February 2007 01:06 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:45 PM.

 Home - Contact Us - Advertise - Rules - diyAudio Store - Sponsors - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - Opt-out policy

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.