|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chiasso
|
Hi All,
I have found on an old computer board a very strange and very simple SMPS based on 78L08. You can find the schematics that I reconstructed from the PCB layout. After a spice simulation, it really works!! But why? The switching frequency is dependent from the L1 and C2 value and also from the input voltage and output current. I don't understand its opearating principle, I think it will use the 7805 as a kind of error amplifier and the circuit oscillated when the feedback becomes positive. Did someone of you already seen this kind of circuit? If yes please give me an explanation on how it works because I am really interested in it (just for curiosity). Thank you ciao -marco |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
R3/R2 sets hysteresis, so it's using Q1 as an inverter and switch, and U1 as an inverter and error amplifier. The values of L1, C2 (and its ESR) should be significant, as this is a hysteresis buck converter.
U1 has poor switching speed, so it's not going to be very fast or efficient. I suppose one would hardly care about efficiency if you're switching with a BJT anyway. Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
IC. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
All 3-pin regulators have switching regulators examples in their applications examples: LM109, LM117, etc.
Some examples p19: http://www.national.com/ds/LM/LM117.pdf It is an inefficient and expensive way of building a regulator, compared to a dedicated IC: it requires more components, a much larger coil, has a poor efficiency and poor dynamic regulation. A real winner. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
For applications where regulation is not very important and extreme efficiency is not needed, a discrete design can often be a better choice than an integrated design. Such as DC power tools, LED lights, battery chargers, and small motor speed controls.
__________________
"Fully on MOSFET = closed switch, Fully off MOSFET = open switch, Half on MOSFET = poor imitation of Tiffany Yep." - also applies to IGBTs! |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Here is something pretty much related. I might try an IC like it for a regulated battery charger.
http://www.national.com/images/pf/LM2575/1147501.pdf Last edited by Electrone; 12th June 2010 at 10:55 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| calypso's poor man solution | calypso | Full Range | 10 | 11th June 2010 01:45 PM |
| Which is the poor man 45 tube? | Jaime | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 20th September 2006 02:53 PM |
| Poor man’s WR125? | rick57 | Full Range | 23 | 27th July 2006 03:23 PM |
| poor man reciever | v1d9uy | Solid State | 4 | 6th January 2006 02:28 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08529 seconds (76.99% PHP - 23.01% MySQL) with 11 queries |