|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Hi!
I've designed a class-d amplifier using TDA8920BJ and this SMPS on the bottom of it. It is a push-pull topology and the transformer core is ETD39. Efficiency of the SMPS is about 80% and the controller circuit is SG3525. I have one question at this point: what happens when the voltage on the battery drops so low, that the feedback cannot sustain the correct output voltage? The PWM-controller of course raises the pulse width to about 50% on both outputs but is this dangerous? The input current to the SMPS seems to stay approximately constant. I don't understand transformers very well. Why it does not input more current when the pulse width rises? The transformer has 4+4 turns on primary and 9+9 on secondary winding. The output voltage is adjusted to about +-25V so the low-limit for input for the circuit to enter max. (50%) pulse width is about 11.1V. I think the transistors do not enter the saturation region since the output voltage is always >8V (they should remain fully open at this point). I can post pictures too. Any tips for improving efficiency? ![]() And btw. very nice forum |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kerala
|
sg3525 will work from 8v to 35v , it is better to check the low volt and shutdown the controller, the pwm max will be 49%, you can add a deadtime resistor to increase deadtime.
you can improve the performance by designing proper transformer, core , winding , coil ( about 32khz with 1st schematics and about 55khz with 2nd schematics(having deadtime resistor)) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Thank you for your answer! The layout is done so changing the circuit is not easy.
But for the original question: is it dangerous if the controller tries to keep the voltage up by raising the duty cycle to ~50%? As far as I know about transformers, they only propagate the power (from primary to secondary circuit) that is needed on the secondary side but is this true in real world? It did not seem harmful when I measured it - nothing heats up and the voltage supply current does not go up. Still I don't really understand why
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
A DC to DC converter that has a regulated output voltage is, more or less, a constant power device. If the input voltage goes up, the average input current will decrease. This means the duty cycle will also decrease. If the voltage goes down, you have the reverse situation.
In a push pull circuit the duty cycle must never reach (exactly) 50%, because there must be some dead time to ensure both power transistor are not on at the same time. If the power supply is properly designed, the transformer should not saturate at the maximum duty cycle. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
OK well dropping the input voltage seems to increase the current so the power stays constant. Well I guess I don't have problems until I see smoke
. I guess the ETD39 core is not saturating but I think I should also calculate/measure that to be sure. However, it is not getting warm.Any suggestions for replacing the transistors? I use now IRF1010N that have max. Vds=55V and the peaks now on drain reach about 63V p-p (or is this OK if the peaks are really short = avalance current stays small?). I can change the snubber capacitors to larger ones but that in turn degrades the efficiency and the snubber resistors are quite hot already. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kerala
|
for 12v irfz48 will do fine.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
So you think the ~63V narrow spikes do not destroy this device (Vdsmax=60V)??
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kerala
|
for 12v design upto 100w i am using IRFZ44 or 48 with small heat-sink, if the transformer is good there wont be that much spike,less than 36v
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oslo - Norway
|
If you have got spikes that reach 63V (might be higher but one need a fast scope to detect it) I would think there is something wrong. When properly designed, there should not be any spiking.
Spiking is tamed with the damping network (cap+resistor, C1+R1 and C2+R2), but with excessive spiking, I would suspect there is something wrong with the core (leakage inductance maybe). (With SG3525 the pulse with will never be higher than ~45%.) space |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Oh I thought the spikes are mostly due to the inductance of the core itself
. I have understood that there always are some sort of spikes and that they are nothing to worry about as far as they are within the maximum ratings of the transistors. And that snubbers are used to dampen the spikes but not of course to wipe them away totally. I will post a picture of the spikes later.Could you suggest any good internet sites that would explain these things in a nutshell? Maybe I should read a bit more about inductors/transformers/smps' . An interesting area however!
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 12V push pull SMPS | Archimedes | Power Supplies | 151 | 11th August 2008 10:39 AM |
| 12V push pull PSU. Need help. | darw82 | Power Supplies | 4 | 3rd June 2007 02:42 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11508 seconds (81.05% PHP - 18.95% MySQL) with 10 queries |