|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all, i am working at a PFC stage ratted at 3kw output power for a switchmode power supply running at 100khz in fullbridge mode
My question is, the Total Hold Up time wich usually in datasheets i see to be arround 20ms, but to achive this THD at 20ms the cappacitors usualy give very large values. I saw in some aplication notes that it usualy takes 1uf per Watt. But if i decrease this THD in some manner let's say 800uS wich i think is enugh to supply the folowing smps knowing that conduction time in that smps running at 100khz is lets say maximum 20uS conduction. What do you think ? I'm saying this coz big cappacitors at 400-450V rated are expensive and large space is required for them on the pcb |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How much ripple can you tolerate?
800us is a pretty small fraction of 100/120Hz line frequency. Obvious solution: at 3kW, capacitors are typically chassis mounted computer grade units, not PCB mounted. ![]() Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
|
Quote:
This gives much lower inductance, and usually higher ripple capacity and lower cost for a given total capacitance (heat dissipated through surface of capacitors, several small capacitors have more surface area than one big one) Ian |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
i agree with iand, i planned to use 10 pieces of 470uf at 400dc at the output of the pfc, but still i want to reduce that cappacity in a manner that i can reduce the pcb dimensions. And i want to know if a short hold-up time will afect the good running of the smps with a thd somewhere at 1-5 ms instead of 20ms
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest in the USA
|
Try it with fewer caps......but leave room on the PCB, since there will be more than a few caps, for the correct number of caps to reach 20ms. Engineering is all about experimenting sometimes and doing things nobody else has attempted/contemplated. Mistakes are learning experiences and quite valuable, IMHO. You learn nothing from success.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| selection of output power tr | arthur | Solid State | 10 | 25th September 2009 10:40 AM |
| Input selection and volume control with balanced output, transportable? | jmaurer | Solid State | 0 | 11th August 2007 07:08 AM |
| PFC question | medogrizli | Power Supplies | 12 | 3rd June 2007 03:49 PM |
| 6G15 output transformer selection | layt | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 2nd July 2006 12:55 AM |
| Driver selection question | rv1890 | Multi-Way | 1 | 21st January 2005 12:57 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09162 seconds (73.18% PHP - 26.82% MySQL) with 10 queries |