|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: n/a
|
Hey all.
I'm currently working on an tube phono stage. Each tube is loaded with a CCS, and I'm using a shunt regulated PSU (one of these ones : HV Shunt Regulator 2009 GB). My question is, as each tube is using a CCS, will it be to use one shunt regulator feeding four CCS's, or will there be some benefit to using one shunt regulator per channel ? Also, for that particular shunt reg, how well filtered should the input DC be ? An LC filter ($$$) will have about 0.5V ripple, while an RC will have about 5V ripple (RCRC will have about 0.3V ripple, but more capacitors :P ). Basically, am I wasting a choke on a filter for a shunt reg ? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If the shunt regulator is worth its money, there should be no need to use one per CCS. On the other hand, if the CCSs are worth their money, there is no need for a shunt regulator to begin with. There are of course theoretical benefits in providing each CCS with the cleanest voltage it can possibly get. Whether there is an audible benefit depends on how good each of them already is on its own. The question only you can answer is: How far do you want to take it.
The same about the input DC. The very purpose of the shunt regulator is to turn an imperfect input into a smooth voltage. It will of course be easier for it when the input voltage is already smooth. Belts and braces so to say. Whether your ears will benefit from that is unanswerable until you try it. And even if your ears benefit, nobody can tell you beforehand whether you will find it worth the effort in the end.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
pacificblue is very right. Personally I would try a cheap RCRCRC then directly to your CCSs. However, if you do insert the shunt regulator you only need one, but give it an easy time with something like RCRC in front of it.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: n/a
|
Thanks for the input guys
![]() I'll stick with a single shunt reg, and play around with ideas for the pre filter, trying to find the perfect cost/performance balance (I already have a nice inductor, but will be better suited to a power amp). |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simplistic Mosfet HV Shunt Regs | Salas | Power Supplies | 3054 | 27th May 2012 04:41 PM |
| Simple Super Shunt and Simple Super Shunt w/CCS vs. JSR03/05 (and other series regs) | hollowman | Power Supplies | 44 | 7th October 2009 07:01 AM |
| CCS fed shunt regulators | mark_titano | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 30th May 2005 03:14 PM |
| Regs - Shunt vs Series | richie00boy | Solid State | 4 | 27th November 2003 07:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06845 seconds (83.51% PHP - 16.49% MySQL) with 10 queries |