
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
21st March 2010, 09:27 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west lafayette

AirCore Transformers with applications in Tesla Coil design
YouTube  Tesla Guitar demonstration
As you're probably aware, Tesla Coils are pretty ridiculous. I've done some research with regards to the underlying mechanisms and am interested in potentially building one. It appears a fundamental component of the Tesla Coil is its transformer. I'm interested in designing an AirCore transformer. However, I'm not sure how to calculate the coupling coefficient (k) for a given geometry. Could anybody offer further insight on this? If we are able to define the Q factor and resonant frequency (f0), would design be fairly straightforward? What other variables should an engineer consider? Temperature is obviously a factor. How close is the behavior of real world transformers compared to simulations? Would it simply be a matter of winding two coils around an insulator (ie cardboard, plastic, etc)? At this point I'm just interested in creating an electrical resonator (electrical input / output) with a given resonant frequency and Q factor. Shouldn't I be able to easily measure its behavior with an Oscilloscope? Intuitively I would assume the coupling coefficient affects the amount of leakage inductance. Would it have any effect on the resonant frequency or the Q factor? Would it be desirable to maximize the coupling coefficient? What geometries would achieve this? Thanks, Thadman
__________________
"It is a profound and necessary truth that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them." 
22nd March 2010, 01:01 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member

k is very, very roughly the ratio of cross sectional areas. For a tall secondary inside a short primary, it will be less (because the top end sees hardly any of the primary / the flux lines are not vertical).
You can test small signal performance quite easily with a sweep generator and oscilloscope, or spectrum analyzer, or network analyzer, or etc. With sufficiently weak coupling, you can tune the primary and secondary independently, and you'll see gain as two humps if they aren't tuned equally, flattopped if adjecent, or one sharp peak if very close. Q multiplication is a seriesresonant thing. I don't really know how much use it is for a lowk transformer. The low k looks like a big series inductor, which can resonate with some of the parasitic capacitance; the remaining capacitance is parallel resonant with the secondary's self inductance. Thus, it looks something like an LLC network, which is seriesparallel resonant. Add a parallel resonant primary and you've got at least five elements in the equivalent circuit. Notice two things: one, the voltage will NEVER "ring up and increase without bound". Q is always finite and therefore the voltage for a given power input is welldefined. Two, when voltage reaches breakdown, Q goes to pot, so for all your smallsignal tuning, it doesn't really mean much, because all those sparks are going to smear it out quite nicely. I don't know how much value there is in lowk Q multiplication (in terms of attaining a voltage gain higher than N2/N1). It seems to me you'll get fine performance just blasting amps into a transformer. You can tune it if you want, and you probably should, since these turns ratios make for big reflected capacitance. By working with transformer action, you don't have to worry about tuning different components, and you can get much hotter sparks out by enforcing a constantvoltage characteristic (or by driving it seriesresonant, you can safely limit inverter current while retaining the highO/Cvoltage characteristic). As for aircore transformers, they're perfectly calculatable, if you don't mind doing an insane amount of computation. Using a suitable model in an E&M simulator, you can get numerical results arbitrarily close to reality. Using a cheezy model, you can get "close enough" results. Using a circuit model, you can get similar results, making whatever assumptions of topology you like. In "close enough" terms, you can get excellent results from a lumpedconstant model consisting of the secondary's parallel RLC equivalent, the series leakage inductance, and the primary's RLC equivalent, plus whatever you're driving it with (constant voltage, resonant, coupled, etc.?). Tim 
29th November 2010, 02:56 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kudus, Malang, Dieng

The magnetic field is only around primary, but it is creating electromagnetic field that transfered and trapped at secondary. It is wireless power transfer that he applied to radio.

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Which, Foil Air Core or Iron Core Inductors  slhijb  MultiWay  16  20th November 2009 04:12 AM 
inductor/choke/air core/ferrite core. . . same thing?  poolorpond  Pass Labs  24  29th March 2008 11:55 PM 
Tesla coil almost killed me!  gearheaddruid  The Lounge  5  22nd March 2008 10:10 PM 
Solen Air core inductors, Hammond Iron core.  gnomus  Swap Meet  0  30th July 2004 02:28 AM 
AIRCore Vs FerriteCore Inductor in ClassD amplifiers  Workhorse  Solid State  13  23rd January 2004 10:14 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 