Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th January 2010, 03:36 PM   #581
dodo is offline dodo  Poland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bydgoszcz , small town in Poland
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikoflexer View Post
Hi Telstar,



I would like to clarify something. These three issues are all different:
1) test the design/circuit
2) test the pcb layout
3) test the manufactured pcb

1) This tries to establish whether the circuit itself works up to the desired specifications. I know it's too much to read, tons of pages, but we have been doing a lot towards this goal. Not only simulations, but built several actual prototypes. Measured noise and line rejection to the best of my ability. Compared with other regulators that I built (other designs). Stormsonic has also done some tests. Hifinutnut also built the design and has done some of his tests. I would have loved to send a built regulator to syn08 or Jan Didden to test, because these two guys have both the tools and the skills to run proper tests. syn08 has me on his ignore list. Jan Didden has shown absolutely no interest in this regulator. In any case, the design has been tested for stability by more than one person, has also been tested for normal functionality, and measured to some extent. The only thing we lack are state of the art measurements.

2) I have etched pcbs myself, manually, to test the layout design. Built several, they all worked.

3) The purpose of this test is only to check that the pcb manufacturer has done a good job. I do understand though that many members would feel much better to see the design tested again at this point. But I expect no design changes at this point.

If people have trust issues with the design then we should not do a group buy. I'm serious. We should stop the GB or delay it, and wait until people are happy with whatever measurements and tests.





No, sorry, you're not wrong. I misunderstood what keantoken said. At some point he said that his scope has internal noise of 10uV, and that would not compete with my 100uV/cm scope. However, his 3a9 diff amp module has 10uV/div as the most sensitive setting, and that is better than my 100uV/cm. This being said, I truly do not believe that many of us will achieve lower noise than 20-30uV peak-to-peak ripple. It's just my opinion after doing a lot of these and my own measurements.







Iko

I understand you point of view , but please take a note that everyone from us belive you made an excellent job.
So I would rather think that way

We (members ot this thread) support you with the statement , that the final regulator ( circiut and layout) shows excelent quality / price ratio,
( taking into the account lack of any exotic parts used )

Cosidering above we (and specially you iko as constructor) challenge some EE to show us ( with the support of the tests) that we could be wrong in our belive.
As always where there is a challenge , it should be some arward.
In this case the additional fee calculated per board would build some sort of arward budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 03:37 PM   #582
diyAudio Member
 
merlin el mago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Blanes - Costa Brava
Hi qusp, thks for info
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 03:40 PM   #583
diyAudio Member
 
merlin el mago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Blanes - Costa Brava
Hi Iko,

Please let me ask to a friend capable to do very good measurements, he is working all day with mechanical robots for medical labs, he has all we needs but first to offer I have to ask him if can do me the help.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 03:56 PM   #584
diyAudio Moderator
 
ikoflexer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Thanks guys! Any help is appreciated.

I'll be gone now for a while, be back later.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 04:15 PM   #585
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
Sometimes a square peg fits a round hole just fine
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
no problem Merlin, as you can see its some pretty serious PCB action going on there; i'll let you know how the I/V stage board goes, will be doing it in 3-4 weeks

ikoflexer, no problem, just say the word and i'll PP you
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 04:37 PM   #586
Telstar is offline Telstar  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodo View Post
I understand you point of view , but please take a note that everyone from us belive you made an excellent job.
So I would rather think that way

We (members ot this thread) support you with the statement , that the final regulator ( circiut and layout) shows excelent quality / price ratio,
( taking into the account lack of any exotic parts used )
I second this statement.
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 04:49 PM   #587
diyAudio Member
 
dvb-projekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Moenchengladbach
Blog Entries: 17
Send a message via Skype™ to dvb-projekt
Wouldīt it be a good idea to integrate the mountings for a SK104 heatsink?

For those who want to place the pcb not at a side of a enclose, this makes it much much easier.
__________________
Reference TDA1541A DAC project PCBīs / Tube-I-zator V2.0 PCB / SSHV-Shunt PCB /
Pedja Rogicīs Discrete Diamond Non-Feedback I/V Stage
- Stock status in my Blog
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 05:12 PM   #588
syn08 is offline syn08  Canada
Account disabled at member's request
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin el mago View Post
Thks for advice

Could you test the Iko regs. please?
Out of curiosity I already did, in simulation and practice. They are both a living disaster in terms of performance and stability.

But apparently they "sound good", so who am I to debate this "design".
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 05:25 PM   #589
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Bas Horneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Blog Entries: 18
Quote:
Out of curiosity I already did, in simulation and practice.
Then why not show the results of your measurements?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2010, 05:25 PM   #590
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Leeuwarden
Quote:
Originally Posted by syn08 View Post
Out of curiosity I already did, in simulation and practice.
Great! How did you setup the practice part?

Quote:
Originally Posted by syn08 View Post
They are both a living disaster in terms of performance and stability.
Could you specify that? Specially the performance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by syn08 View Post
But apparently they "sound good", so who am I to debate this "design".
Well, then don't. But could you give us some figures?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The simplistic Salas low voltage shunt regulator ikoflexer Power Supplies 4802 11th February 2012 01:16 AM
Tube for a shunt voltage regulator jarthel Tubes / Valves 14 26th October 2006 05:19 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 PM.

Page generated in 0.12757 seconds (77.10% PHP - 22.90% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright Đ1999-2012 diyAudio