|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1421 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1422 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
I have read that battery power is not necessarily low impedance and its AC performance won't be as good as a well design regulator. When I try equipments, I always find that the higher the PSSR the better the sound. I guess that the problem with all opamps is that they are good at low frequencies but bad at higher frequencies. My build of v1.1 with film caps should behave very well above 200Hz at least, even using the current value of 2k4 resistor and 1.1uF capacitor. So for me it is a solved problem. If the lower Idss could lift the resistor to about 5k, I would be happy to use 2 x 1.1uF with a single regulator to drive the entire circuit. If not, I will use two separate regulators to drive the high-mid and bass-sub separately. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1423 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
Don't get your output cap very low though IMHO. It does not terminate as it should in rise time for driving current to the shunt mosfet. What is the main benefit you like for your films across vref? Less grain and lumpiness? And then you will compare boutique ones? Never ending story... Batteries must be bypassed with thousands of uf, still their impedance rises with frequency a lot though. They also can present weird chemical noise. In general, it gets a truckload of special high amperage batteries in parallel to compete. Not elegant at least. He had it much better than with 317-337 already with the batteries as he said, so the comment goes to ''it will better be a shunt in your lows too'', if the guys experience has anything to do with your line circuits.
|
|
|
|
|
#1424 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
|
You can lower the current through Vref by inserting a resistor between the gate and source of the jfet. The gate stays connected to R5. Then you can increase R7 and Rtrim, if you want that. I run in v2 about 250uA through Vref.
|
|
|
|
|
#1425 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
It does work, but the internal impedance will go up, so the root noise of the jfet too. A small thing, but I may remind.
|
|
|
|
|
#1426 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
Replace your 470uF with a 1+uF film cap and hear it. Last edited by HiFiNutNut; 21st October 2009 at 02:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1427 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
|
Ikoflexer,
When you did the simulations with estonishing low impedance figures in the first couple of pages of this thread, did you include some ESR into the Vref bypass capacitor? Regards, Bill |
|
|
|
|
#1428 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
I have done all those things. That is why I am asking what you hear so to see if it correlates. I just give ''behaving'' practical and economic enough values that work more or less balanced in many systems and are easy for layout. In my personal phono I use 10uF Mundorf plain supreme.
|
|
|
|
|
#1429 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
With a resistor between g and s, the noise increase will be so little to justify any concerns, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
#1430 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
|
In all simulations I try to pretend a somewhat careless implementation; For caps I usually do ESR = 1R and ESL = 15uH. Pretty extreme eh?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15126 seconds (71.04% PHP - 28.96% MySQL) with 11 queries |