|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
For example how could you power one set of speakers with a class A and AB1? Cheers for any help this has proper got me scratiching my head!
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Either that, or Dr. Self's "Trimodal" amplifier
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
I'm contemplating modulating a SMPS with audio to produce a varying voltage for driving a subwoofer in a way not completely different from the "ampliverter" idea.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That would be a class D amplifier then, if you get it to work.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Back in my early audio days I remember getting all the reference material on audio amplifier design that the college library had. I saw information on the "Tigersaurus" and later-published information on class G and then later, class H. The Tigersaurus was a very brute-force way to increase the SOA of the output stage and was based on the earlier Tiger design. It was later when I was given a copy of Electronics World that I was intrigued by the c. 1966 design of a class D amplifier.
I'm not sure at this time what to call the idea of modulating the hot side of a SMPS to produce a varying signal on the secondary side. Maybe that way offers no real advantage from regular class D, where the power supply voltage on the secondary side remains rather stable. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
There's an implementation for an analog amplifier that switches the supply voltage.
__________________
"Fully on MOSFET = closed switch, Fully off MOSFET = open switch, Half on MOSFET = poor imitation of Tiffany Yep." - also applies to IGBTs! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
I've played with the idea a bit, first by driving a speaker in class A mode with the output of a modulated SMPS, and later by doing simulations of a power supply that provides tracking power to a subwoofer amplifier. The response of the power supply was limited, but it should work for a subwoofer amplifier.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Use a plain unregulated SMPS and a class D circuit fed with the output rails. It gives the best performance.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Actually, decreasing the power stage supply voltage at low volume settings reduces the switching losses. (The logic operates from an independent power supply.)
__________________
"Fully on MOSFET = closed switch, Fully off MOSFET = open switch, Half on MOSFET = poor imitation of Tiffany Yep." - also applies to IGBTs! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Amplifier Classes | soundNERD | Solid State | 56 | 11th June 2004 09:16 PM |
| Biasing for different classes | demons_wing | Solid State | 11 | 5th May 2004 05:57 PM |
| amp classes | emarald | Solid State | 1 | 10th February 2003 11:03 AM |
| NYC - Tube amp classes | nycnewbe | Introductions | 0 | 4th March 2002 07:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11700 seconds (73.37% PHP - 26.63% MySQL) with 10 queries |