|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
19th March 2008, 05:09 AM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HK
|
Improved version of 78xx?
Hi all,
I had just notice that there are different grades of the 78xx from Onsemi and Ti. For Onsemi, the MC78xxA is better than the MC78xx. Ripple rejection (5V): 83dB vs 68dB Output Noise: 10uV/V Output Impedance: 0.9mR For Ti, TL780x better than uA780x Ripple rejection (5V): 85dB vs 78dB Output Noise: 75uV vs 40uV -- not sure how to made of this. Output Impedance: 3.5mR vs 17mR. Just wonder if anybody has comments on the improved version of the 78xx. Another question is in the older 78xx, one has to be careful with the output cap having too low ESR. But I can't find any notes of this in the newer datasheets. Is this a thing of the past and can I use low ESR caps without problems? TIA. ...Chuck T |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NP caps after 78xx regs ? (+schem) | redrabbit | Power Supplies | 0 | 14th January 2007 08:28 PM |
| 317 vs 78xx | Leolabs | Solid State | 2 | 20th March 2006 04:37 AM |
| HT regulator using 78xx | poynton | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 9th February 2006 06:50 PM |
| regulation of 78XX and 79XX at low curent | Jim Mullally | Parts | 4 | 3rd June 2004 11:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
